Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Wes Miller Thread

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • leeraymond
    replied
    Originally posted by sedz View Post
    They've got to be horrible. But I'll give everyone a break from stats for a few days. I have a newborn. His name is Oscar.
    Congratulations on the new baby. His name is Oscar. Wow! That is a good name. Take care.

    Leave a comment:


  • sedz
    replied
    Originally posted by leeraymond View Post

    Yeah. I believe that. Have you seen UC's conference stats? Take a look at them and tell us what you think. Worst that I have ever seen.
    They've got to be horrible. But I'll give everyone a break from stats for a few days. I have a newborn. His name is Oscar.

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.tzdm_E...pr=3.1&pid=1.7

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.o7Lee...1&pid=3.1&rm=2

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    https://i.imgflip.com/9ilc9y.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    Originally posted by Oldtimer_UC_fan View Post

    It would be a lot better if he was in a Royals uniform.
    I saw that pic too. I will try to make a memes with him as a Bearcat.

    Leave a comment:


  • leeraymond
    replied
    Originally posted by sedz View Post
    Our offense sits at #172, one spot above Cal Poly. It's now the worst Bearcats offense ever in the Torvik era, going back to 2008. Worse than Brannen's teams or the early Cronin years. We're getting dangerously close to below the median nationally, which is #182.
    Yeah. I believe that. Have you seen UC's conference stats? Take a look at them and tell us what you think. Worst that I have ever seen.

    Leave a comment:


  • sedz
    replied
    Our offense sits at #172, one spot above Cal Poly. It's now the worst Bearcats offense ever in the Torvik era, going back to 2008. Worse than Brannen's teams or the early Cronin years. We're getting dangerously close to below the median nationally, which is #182.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oldtimer_UC_fan
    replied
    Originally posted by leeraymond View Post

    Hey Leo, where do you get all of these Oscar quotes from? Not bad.
    It would be a lot better if he was in a Royals uniform.

    Leave a comment:


  • leeraymond
    replied
    Originally posted by leo from jersey View Post
    Hey Leo, where do you get all of these Oscar quotes from? Not bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied

    Hero Ball. But this guy was a hero because he did it all and he did it for his team,

    https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-but-after-that-you-don-t-see-a-lot-of-real-good-fundamental-play-you-see-a-showboat-oscar-robertson-58-11-44.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • GoBearcats31
    replied
    Happy birthday to Coach Miller - let's turn this around tonight

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnFrancis
    replied
    Originally posted by Oldtimer_UC_fan View Post

    Missouri last 4 years.....12-21, 25-10, 8-24, 15-4
    Gates was hired in 2022 inherited a dumpster fire extended in 2023…this season is year 3….SEC a lot tougher top to bottom

    Leave a comment:


  • sedz
    replied
    Originally posted by leeraymond View Post

    Listen Sedz, I understand what you are saying. What I am saying to you is that UC is not good at playing in the 4 out / 1 in system. BYU has some good size in the starting lineup. Their starting point guard is 6'5". They can send a 6'7", 6'8" (big body), and a 6'9" (guard) to the boards. BYU is out rebounding teams by + 9.2. How is UC going to handle that. They bring off the bench a 6'9", 6'10", and 6'6" (big body) to help.

    BYU plays 4 out / 1 in but they have the size on their roster to play with two bigs or any other way that they want to play. UC cannot do that. That may be hurting UC. BYU's roster is much more flexible. Throughout the course of a game, my guess is we will see BYU play with a number of different lineups other than 4 out / 1 in.

    Nevertheless, I hope that UC can win this game. This would be a pretty good win.
    Yep, BYU plays the modern positionless style that I've been promoting for years. They always have big guards and wings that can play multiple positions. They can really score and rebound. Wings, wings, and more wings. I think we have the personnel to try that, but Wes has too traditional of a mindset. He's always had a pure C and a pure PG in his lineups.

    Leave a comment:


  • leeraymond
    replied
    Originally posted by sedz View Post
    BYU plays a 4 out 1 in system, and last year played a lot of 5 out. In fact, I'm struggling to come up with a single team I've watched this year that doesn't play 4 out or 5 out.
    Listen Sedz, I understand what you are saying. What I am saying to you is that UC is not good at playing in the 4 out / 1 in system. BYU has some good size in the starting lineup. Their starting point guard is 6'9". They can send a 6'7", 6'8" (big body), and a 6'5" (guard) to the boards. BYU is out rebounding teams by + 9.2. How is UC going to handle that? They bring off the bench a 6'9", 6'10", and 6'6" (big body) to help.

    BYU plays 4 out / 1 in but they have the size on their roster to play with two bigs or any other way that they want to play. UC cannot do that. That may be hurting UC. BYU's roster is much more flexible. Throughout the course of a game, my guess is we will see BYU play with a number of different lineups other than 4 out / 1 in.

    Nevertheless, I hope that UC can win this game. This would be a pretty good win.
    Last edited by leeraymond; 01-26-2025, 11:30 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Responsive Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X