Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oklahoma St. 2/21 7:00 ESPN+
Collapse
X
-
Oklahoma St. 2/21 7:00 ESPN+
Get to the game and support the team for this one. It is not sold out. The team Needs SUPPORT and crowd noise. If we get down, don't boo the players. Bring them back into the game together. We really can't afford to lose this one and make the NCAAs.Last edited by Lobot; 02-19-2024, 06:49 PM.Tags: None
-
Originally posted by leeraymond View Post
Yeah, you are correct. However, that Nevada team was an older very aggressive team. I do not know if Miller can get that type of productivity out of such a young team. However, if nothing else, UC's bench should be light years better than what it is this year. Also, those guys will push the veteran guys very hard in practice. That is what makes a program better. When the guy behind you is trying to take your starting spot, it makes you play with more of a sense of purpose.
It's funny. Those twins look bigger than they are.
-
Originally posted by sedz View PostCody Martin is smaller than Skillings. He's 6'6" 205.
It's funny. Those twins look bigger than they are.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SKell82155 View Post
Dude, don’t leave us hanging !
Are you writing a book & amping for pre-production
sales, lol ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lobot View Post
Terry is not the only one with that opinion. And there’s a little more to it than that.
Are you writing a book & amping for pre-production
sales, lol ?
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Miller is by far a better coach than what we have over on the football side of the field. As others have said, this is the first year in the Big 12 and the experts did not expect UC to do much. Let Miller build his team to be built for the Big 12.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sedz View PostSkillings is playing PF for us right now at 6'6" 215 (205 in high school). If you don't like the idea of Betsey at PF, just keep Skillings there. The idea is to be positionless. Sure, bigger players can push Skillings around but he compensates for that in other ways. Betsey might not be heavy enough to play like a traditional power forward, but if we have four athletic guys in the 6'6" to 6'8", 190 to 220 pound range, we can compete on the glass.
Dana Altman had several great teams like that at Oregon. The Nevada team that beat us was built like that.
The lineup that you mentioned probably will be put in play sometime during next season. We will see how well it works.Last edited by leeraymond; 02-23-2024, 08:56 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by leo from jersey View Post
how do we adjust in the game to win. The effort on defense wasn't there and I saw nothing to change that from the bench.
Leave a comment:
-
Skillings is playing PF for us right now at 6'6" 215 (205 in high school). If you don't like the idea of Betsey at PF, just keep Skillings there. The idea is to be positionless. Sure, bigger players can push Skillings around but he compensates for that in other ways. Betsey might not be heavy enough to play like a traditional power forward, but if we have four athletic guys in the 6'6" to 6'8", 190 to 220 pound range, we can compete on the glass.
Dana Altman had several great teams like that at Oregon. The Nevada team that beat us was built like that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sedz View PostOverall it's a pretty big lineup. It replaces size at the 5 with size on the wing. And it's athletic at every position so should be decent at rebounding.
I think of small ball as four guards, like our 2012 team with Jaquon Parker at the 4. Even though we had a true big in Yancy at the 5, it was still a small ball lineup. This lineup only has one guard with four forwards. I don't necessarily favor anything. I think we should put our best group out there regardless of what type of lineup it is. In a couple years we don't have any true bigs committed right now, and I'm just pointing out that we don't have to go out and find one. There are other ways to construct a roster.
You know, I have always thought that if a bunch of freshman (no matter how good) can come into a serious D-1 program and move the veterans out, that program probably did not have a lot going for itself. There is no way a bunch of freshman should be able to come into a D-1 program and take positions. The only time I know of something like that happening is at the U of Michigan with the Fab Five. As good as they were, they were not able to win a national championship. They lost the championship game twice to two different teams (Duke and North Carolina). But hey, at least they were able to play in that game; twice.Last edited by leeraymond; 02-23-2024, 08:22 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by leeraymond View Post
This is an interesting lineup. However, this lineup may have problems rebounding against more physical teams (especially against Houston) or teams with big inside playing front lines. However, this group would perhaps be a very good scoring group. I see you favor small ball lineups. Also, this group is very very young.
I think of small ball as four guards, like our 2012 team with Jaquon Parker at the 4. Even though we had a true big in Yancy at the 5, it was still a small ball lineup. This lineup only has one guard with four forwards. I don't necessarily favor anything. I think we should put our best group out there regardless of what type of lineup it is. In a couple years we don't have any true bigs committed right now, and I'm just pointing out that we don't have to go out and find one. There are other ways to construct a roster.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sedz View PostExactly. This lineup won't be ready next year, but looking ahead we could have four 6'6 to 6'8 forwards out there: Jizzle, Skillings, Rayvon, Betsey, McKinley. Obviously we should have a big body available when we need it, but that could be a dangerous group.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bearcat93 View Post13 years as a head coach with only 2 NCAA tournament appearances and zero wins. Take a good look at what Wes accomplished at UNCG. How he landed this gig is pretty unreal. Most times when a smaller school /lower league coach gets a big time job, they have led that smaller /lower league team to some deep tournament success. While it’s not the only measure of success, it should be a key criteria
for hire.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by longtimefan View Post
I haven’t. We’ll have three top 100 recruits joining the roster, Rayvon and the two Tyler’s. As far as I know only two guys, Newman and Oguama, will not be back next year. That’s another reason we must finish strong, get those 2 guys to the tournament.
Leave a comment:
Responsive Ad Widget
Collapse
Leave a comment: