Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
West Virginia 2/19 7:00 ESPN2
Collapse
X
-
West Virginia 2/19 7:00 ESPN2
Return game. Need it.Tags: None
-
They both have top 25 defenses that force a lot of turnovers. And of course they're good scoring teams. That's the point, small ball gets more scoring on the floor. I'm not following this logic. Going small is a bad strategy because good coaching staffs do it? Shouldn't we be looking to good coaching staffs for ideas?Originally posted by leeraymond View Post
Yeah, but Ole Miss and Texas Tech are really good scoring teams, with very good coaching staffs. These are two things that UC does not have. Besides, neither one of the players that you mentioned is particularly a good one-on-one defender. In a switching man-to-man, I can maybe see a team that would be competitive.
"Use that which works, and take it from any place you can find it." - Bruce Lee
In any case, we have been going small for around 10 mpg since Page stopped getting minutes, and our offense has been better. My idea is to cut PG minutes and replace them with bigger wings.
-
Amen brother.Originally posted by D.A.H. View Post
say what you will about him, they lost reynolds, and mckinley got hurt. there's the inside bruisers that they're missing.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, but Ole Miss and Texas Tech are really good scoring teams, with very good coaching staffs. These are two things that UC does not have. Besides, neither one of the players that you mentioned is particularly a good one-on-one defender. In a switching man-to-man, I can maybe see a team that would be competitive.Originally posted by sedz View PostFrom quick rotations, which you can't do with slow big men. No one is going to just stand in the paint like a traditional 5. This has been done before, both in college and the NBA. Ole Miss runs some very small lineups out there this year. They aren't a great rebounding team but they make up for it by forcing turnovers. I think that's what we need. Texas Tech is also small but Toppin is a great undersized rebounder. It would be nice if Mitchell could fill that role. They are about the same size.Last edited by leeraymond; 02-22-2025, 11:28 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
JB and Tari may have been personal and at that time, JB felt he had job security at that point but he jst didn't get it. he also had Mikey Saunders, Madsen and Zach H if I remember.Originally posted by sedz View PostSupposedly, but you wouldn't know it from his coaching decisions. His only full season in 2021 was our fastest in decades, but he ran everything through Keith Williams who was an awful shooter. And we had a backcourt trio of DDJ, MAW, and Davenport that couldn't get to the rim. He had Tari Eason on the bench and was afraid to use him, instead playing Chris Vogt who had a negative BPM. A lot of the same issues we're having now. So if he was using analytics, he's not using them how I would.
Leave a comment:
-
Supposedly, but you wouldn't know it from his coaching decisions. His only full season in 2021 was our fastest in decades, but he ran everything through Keith Williams who was an awful shooter. And we had a backcourt trio of DDJ, MAW, and Davenport that couldn't get to the rim. He had Tari Eason on the bench and was afraid to use him, instead playing Chris Vogt who had a negative BPM. A lot of the same issues we're having now. So if he was using analytics, he's not using them how I would.Originally posted by London 'Cat View PostWasn’t Brannen an analytics user? I seem to remember that about him.
Leave a comment:
-
what about the PG -- CWM had to know Reynolds was going. Why wasn't his replacement recruited.Originally posted by D.A.H. View Post
say what you will about him, they lost reynolds, and mckinley got hurt. there's the inside bruisers that they're missing.
Leave a comment:
-
Neither Reynolds nor Lahkin liked how they were being used, or the rotation with Aziz last season. Lahkin is the only player that showed any improvement from year to year until last year when CWM brought in Aziz and Reynolds.Originally posted by D.A.H. View Post
say what you will about him, they lost reynolds, and mckinley got hurt. there's the inside bruisers that they're missing.
Leave a comment:
-
Wasn’t Brannen an analytics user? I seem to remember that about him.
Leave a comment:
-
Right, I don't think we were ever connected with him and probably had no chance to afford whatever Bama is paying. I just remember him being my dream hire at that time. He uses analytics more than any college coach. Fast pace, no midrange.Originally posted by D.A.H. View Post
he was and he wasn't. iirc, it was pretty well known that he was going to 'bama.
Leave a comment:
-
say what you will about him, they lost reynolds, and mckinley got hurt. there's the inside bruisers that they're missing.Originally posted by leo from jersey View Post
Some advocate positionless rosters with guys playing all positions. There might be something to it if at least two could bang and one could pass to open teammates or will pass.
Leave a comment:
-
From quick rotations, which you can't do with slow big men. No one is going to just stand in the paint like a traditional 5. This has been done before, both in college and the NBA. Ole Miss runs some very small lineups out there this year. They aren't a great rebounding team but they make up for it by forcing turnovers. I think that's what we need. Texas Tech is also small but Toppin is a great undersized rebounder. It would be nice if Mitchell could fill that role. They are about the same size.Originally posted by leeraymond View Post
Come on now Sedz. That lineup would get killed. Where is the defense and rebounding going to come from? Not big enough for inside the paint play. However, with McKinley and another active big man, maybe. Especially with Abaev.
Leave a comment:
-
Am I alone in having this feeling ? Super home court arena, cool uniforms, Jordan Brand, Air Jordan shoes, slick social media content.... all of it seems undeserved... I'm not trying to be cruel or personal about the players (and coaches) on this team but.... Just seems like they've gotten a lot of rewards for earning exactly nothing... maybe its just me being bitter at where we are as a program but... it's hard for me to not see all these trappings as being un-earned
Leave a comment:
-
Come on now Sedz. That lineup would get killed. Where is the defense and rebounding going to come from? Not big enough for inside the paint play. However, with McKinley and another active big man, maybe. Especially with Abaev.Originally posted by sedz View PostIt works if you have wings who can all rebound and guard multiple positions, possibly having to double team a good post scorer. Simas doesn't fit that mold. But I think you can run out Reed, Mitchell, Skillings, Betsey, and Rayvon together. I'd just like to try it once. Abaev and McKinley would fit too. If the other team presses you can go with a PG and four wings.
Leave a comment:
Responsive Ad Widget
Collapse
Leave a comment: