Am I the only person who thinks the TV coverage for hoops is pure garbage? ESPN+ is the dregs of college sports and we get a ton of it. Peacock? WTF, Home Shopping Network wasn't an option? No way I'm buying Peacock to watch a couple UC games. UC would have better TV coverage if they stayed in C-USA or the American. Time to fire the Big-12 Commish if this is the best they can do.
-
-
It's funny you posted this; I was just thinking the same thing.
I was thinking of subscribing to ESPN when I saw they covered all the pre-conference games but then the TV coverage goes all over the place for the conference games. I never understood why so many were against Mick and his 25-30 wins every year and the push to go to the B12.
I'd much rather be in the upper half of any conference, than be in the lower half of the big 12. This isn't fun. -
I'm not happy about all the Peacock games either. But since we can't fix that, you don't need Peacock until Jan. 16 and if you're a subscriber of Apple TV service it's $12.99 a month if you go through Apple and bundle rather than the $19.99 directly through NBC.
The tough ones for me are the games on CBSSN and TNT. I think both of those are stand alone subscriptions for streamers at this point although that might change. If you have cable, it shouldn't be a big deal unless you don't get CBSSN in your sports packageBrent Wyrick
92 Final Four Front Row
@LobotC2DFWComment
-
Peacock is cheaper through directtv. I don't know the exact price as it is deducted monthly. I don't mind espn+/ Sure I would rather get them through sportschannel Ohio, but I am happy that I get them. I even laugh at the Spanish commercials, but since I get both NYC and Philly TV, I am used to them now.
I want the season to start now.Comment
-
I long for the days when you didn't have to have search warrant and a atlas to find what channel your favorite team is on?
Comment
-
The Bearcat Bounce. Back before TV contracts and Conference contracts ruled.Comment
Comment