Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BCS officials want to lend stability to new system
Collapse
X
-
This makes me fully understand the BCS. It is designed to place #1 vs #2 to crown a champion. The other BCS bowls are consolation prizes. So, if this will continue to be the case, the only think that may change is either 1, adding another bowl (Cotton?), awarding a BCS bid to MWC/CUSA or some other, and having 3 "at large" births....or 2, leaving as is.
The "Big Boys" will pitch their b!tch about the Big East not deserving a bid, but I don't think I will get very far. No Big East team has ever played in the BCS national title game (although we were close), so what is their gripe?
The system seems to be working just fine if you ask me.
Comment
-
Possible changes in BCS may impact BYU
There's a chance that AQ bids could go away. How could this affect BYU, which is mulling a move to the Big East?
"Conferences such as the Big East, which are in danger of losing their AQ status, are trying to recruit successful football programs — Boise State, for example — to improve their standing," Wojciechowski writes. "But according to a conference official familiar with the content of the BCS meetings, the Big East would be affected by any model that forces the league to forfeit its AQ standing.
Comment
Responsive Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment