Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Texas, Oklahoma reach out to SEC about joining conference
Collapse
X
-
let's hope PAC goes to 16, BIG takes Kansas/IA State and goes to 16, ACC follows suit and adds us/WVU (best case scenario)
-
I doubt they will drop the basement dwellers like Vandy, GT, Duke, Tennessee, IU, Illinois, etc... because they do rotate through some good years too. Plus you have to have someone to lose and the "big boys" don't want it to be them. I can see some movement into larger conferences or affiliations. I don't think that means UC will be in the same conference as 'Bama or Central State College in Columbus (the one in Ohio). As many have pointed out, look at what Cincy has done with one fourth the budget or less. We will see some kind of scheduling affiliation at least that gives more tv revenue, maybe not as much as SEC or the B!G, possibly even a membership in expanded conference.Originally posted by bearcatbret View PostUC proved that we could compete in the Big East beating the likes of Pitt, Louisville, WV, and the rest of them. I suspect that the end game by the power brokers will be to add teams to conferences, merge conferences, change names of conferences, and lose the dead weight of teams that are annual basement dwealers.
Side note: bigger conferences allow for more marquee games, but you can't play everyone even in a two year period. I predict as we get into divisions, there will be a dominant team or two in each division and some of the "big boys" be be dominated several years in a row.
Leave a comment:
-
UC proved that we could compete in the Big East beating the likes of Pitt, Louisville, WV, and the rest of them. I suspect that the end game by the power brokers will be to add teams to conferences, merge conferences, change names of conferences, and lose the dead weight of teams that are annual basement dwealers.
Leave a comment:
-
UC’s worst nightmare occurring before it’s eyes . . . I never get excited when expansion talks start up because UC will never have a seat at the PX table.Originally posted by Lobot View PostBig 12 and PAC 12 are discussing a scheduling alliance and possible merger today.
Leave a comment:
-
Big 12 and PAC 12 are discussing a scheduling alliance and possible merger today.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't think Texas or Oklahoma are really in a bind as it relates to waiting out the current agreement and not having to pay the penalty. They've got a secure future. They can afford to stare down the remaining members who do not.
Leave a comment:
-
Not only will the left behind 8 get the buyout, there is a clause in media deals to add around $25 million per school added. This is split between ESPN and Fox, maybe the left behind 8 invite schools and off the new teams the ESPN portion and let Fox renegotiate a lesser amount per school to keep good will with a future media partner. If an ACC is even in initial discussion phase, we say no to the Big 12. However, there may be circumstances where joining the Big 12 for a few years is worth the money. Of course the kicker is UC (and other AAC members) should be wary of maintaining good graces of ESPN, but I don't think UC is in their good graces now.Originally posted by CincyBearcats2 View Post
You’re forgetting the 100+ million the schools would split from Oklahoma and Texas leaving the conference. If it dissolves they owe nothing. However if the Big 12 stays they have to pay their leaving fee which is EXPENSIVE.
Leave a comment:
-
I think UT and OU use the buyout as a means to leave prior to 2025. If the conference dissolves, they won’t have to pay any amount. But they can give them some money less than the full buyout to leave early. We’ve seen this happen in prior realignments.Originally posted by CincyBearcats2 View Post
You’re forgetting the 100+ million the schools would split from Oklahoma and Texas leaving the conference. If it dissolves they owe nothing. However if the Big 12 stays they have to pay their leaving fee which is EXPENSIVE.
Leave a comment:
-
You’re forgetting the 100+ million the schools would split from Oklahoma and Texas leaving the conference. If it dissolves they owe nothing. However if the Big 12 stays they have to pay their leaving fee which is EXPENSIVE.Originally posted by made_hand View PostJustin William's Twitter :
For reference, even at a 50% reduction, that $14 million per school for the remaining Big 12 members would be roughly double what the new AAC TV deal brings in for its programs each year.
Quote Tweet

Sam Khan Jr.
@skhanjr
· 14m
Big 12 commish Bob Bowlsby estimates that the remaining eight Big 12 schools could lose $14 million per year in TV revenue upon Oklahoma and Texas' departure. Bowlsby says Big 12 distributes roughly $28 million in TV $$ per school. OU/Texas = about 50% of that.
So, Im guessing the magic number for the AAC to retain everyone and add Big12 schools is a renegotiated value with ESPN of $14m per school. Ill take take.
Leave a comment:
-
I think you’re right. The Big 12 should not be on our radar. I’m glad we didn’t go a few years ago. It will all depend on the TV contracts.Originally posted by bearcatbret View PostI might be a homer but I believe that the AAC has better value and a bigger TV audience than the remaining 8. When the dust settles, some of those schools will have a rude awakening.
Leave a comment:
-
I might be a homer but I believe that the AAC has better value and a bigger TV audience than the remaining 8. When the dust settles, some of those schools will have a rude awakening.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
14m isn't enough to elevate us much though it would certainly help with the budget... I'm reading that Notre Dame isn't interested in the ACC so our only hope is WVU pitching us as a partner to join ACC... however, ACC could want someone in Texas even though it makes no sense geographically... (unless they goto 20 and make a West Division... who knows). Still holding out some hope we don't get stuck in the AAC forever
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Justin William's Twitter :
For reference, even at a 50% reduction, that $14 million per school for the remaining Big 12 members would be roughly double what the new AAC TV deal brings in for its programs each year.
Quote Tweet

Sam Khan Jr.
@skhanjr
· 14m
Big 12 commish Bob Bowlsby estimates that the remaining eight Big 12 schools could lose $14 million per year in TV revenue upon Oklahoma and Texas' departure. Bowlsby says Big 12 distributes roughly $28 million in TV $$ per school. OU/Texas = about 50% of that.
So, Im guessing the magic number for the AAC to retain everyone and add Big12 schools is a renegotiated value with ESPN of $14m per school. Ill take take.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
It'd still earn bid to an expanded CFP, though the AAC could do that too with the champion being one of highest 6 ranked conference championship. It would give a sliver of more hope to get a team into current CFP. It would be quality football.Originally posted by Rufus View PostIf it were possible to include every big 12 team and that includes WVU and Kansas, along with BYU and Boise State and combine them with the AAC wouldn't it be still considered a power 5 conference ?
However, the power designation comes from money, and that only comes when TV contracts believe your viewership with be high. Neither the AAC nor the left behind 8 move the needle in viewership. Add in that none of those schools, or combination of schools, bring in even half of the history/clout as OU or UT Austin alone, let alone with Big 12 losing both.
Leave a comment:
-
If it were possible to include every big 12 team and that includes WVU and Kansas, along with BYU and Boise State and combine them with the AAC wouldn't it be still considered a power 5 conference ?
Leave a comment:
Responsive Ad Widget
Collapse
Leave a comment: