No game in 2025
2026 at Paycor Stadium downtown
Canceled after that
https://247sports.com/college/cincin...lry-234187282/
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
UC-Miami Rivalry
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by London 'Cat View Post
I say UC keeps its payment to MU the same. If it truly values the rivalry, it should play it for the sake of that rivalry. If they balk, UC walks. And there is no reason for UC to play at MU. Nippert or nothing.
Nonetheless, a neutral site game should mean we pay them less and each gets revenue based on increased ticket sales. I'd rather have it at Nippert every 2-3 years, but find it is acceptable to keep the rivalry going at a neutral site.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bearcatjd View PostI believe that the other p4 schools they play don't give them a return game in Oxford as we do or a game in Cincy at Paycor with them I believe as the home team. So give them more money & let's play them every year at Nippert.
Leave a comment:
-
I believe that the other p4 schools they play don't give them a return game in Oxford as we do or a game in Cincy at Paycor with them I believe as the home team. So give them more money & let's play them every year at Nippert.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
I read a neutral site game every 2-3 years, nothing final yet. I like the idea of not playing them annually, while also keeping a rivalry with this much history going. There's no way we are paying them 750,000-1,000,000 to play at Nippertjust because some Big 10 teams pay them that amount.
Curiosity - How much do they pay us to come to Oxford?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GoBearcats31 View PostChad Brendel: Sources tell @BearcatJournal that UC and Miami are trending towards a plan to continue the Victory Bell in some capacity going forward. Likely to be a neutral site type deal every few seasons.
Leave a comment:
-
Chad Brendel: Sources tell @BearcatJournal that UC and Miami are trending towards a plan to continue the Victory Bell in some capacity going forward. Likely to be a neutral site type deal every few seasons.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by swilsonsp4 View Post
I'm not at all concerned about the Shootout ending. The UC-Miami rivalry is ending because the chasm between the Haves and Have-Nots is now huge. The Redhawks are cash-strapped and need more buy games. That's not the case for XU (at least to the extent of G5 football schools).Last edited by Bearcat93; 07-31-2024, 10:22 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bearcat93 View PostCurious - UC hasn't been very effective in winning (6 wins in the last 21 meetings) the Crosstown Shootout in the last 20 years. What do folks think if that goes away, too? Any concerns?
Leave a comment:
-
The idea used to be keeping the money in-state when scheduling a non-conference foe...like Tennessee playing Memphis, Chattanooga, Austin Peay, etc. now that's all out the window
Leave a comment:
-
Curious - UC hasn't been very effective in winning (6 wins in the last 21 meetings) the Crosstown Shootout in the last 20 years. What do folks think if that goes away, too? Any concerns?
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by swilsonsp4 View PostMiami staff, including Chuck Martin, were bellyaching a while back about not being paid sufficiently to play down here. They opted out of the NIppert games, so UC responded by opting out of playing at Yager.
Per Keegan Knickoson, UC will try to fill the 2025 game with another, comparable G5 team.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bearcatbret View PostI just hope that we can win this year to get the Bell back. I would hate for them to keep the Bell for the rest of history.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
I just hope that we can win this year to get the Bell back. I would hate for them to keep the Bell for the rest of history.
Leave a comment:
Responsive Ad Widget
Collapse
Leave a comment: