Predictions for '26

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lobot
    Administrator
    • Apr 2007
    • 28223

    #1

    Predictions for '26

    The media has chimed in on their expectations for the Bearcats this season with most of them putting UC at .500 or below this season.

    What's are your thoughts on where we end up at the end of the season?

    Schedule:

    Last edited by Lobot; Yesterday, 11:31 AM.
    Brent Wyrick
    92 Final Four Front Row
    @LobotC2DFW
  • leo from jersey
    Veteran
    • Apr 2007
    • 6178

    #2
    well we have a new DC. Waiting to see how he will succeed. The offense worries me, but this great line can do wonders for the so called skilled players. If we get off to a bad start will Coach Satt mail it in?

    Comment

    • Bearcat Chris
      Veteran
      • Apr 2007
      • 2429

      #3
      3-9

      I have never been so disinterested in UC football in my 45 years of having season tickets. I did buy the expensive season tickets with my cousin, but we both did it very reluctantly, hoping for a miracle season. Satterfield will be gone at the end of the season, and then we’re looking at two years of rebuilding. Cunningham should be fired for giving such a horrible contract to a coach, who was gonna be fired by Louisville.

      I hope I’m wrong, I used to love the falls, and UC football, and followed everything about them, and now even the local media is ignoring them. Let’s hope this is a surprise season, but I doubt it.

      B.C.
      "A witness to the pinnacle of UC Football, the 2020 and 2021 seasons... not likely to ever happen again!"

      Comment

      • bearcatbret
        Veteran
        • May 2008
        • 8378

        #4
        I believe they will be below .500 and not make a bowl game. However, this past week, I was at a conference. I spoke with a diehard Bearcats fan who follows the football team. He thinks that they will end up with 8 wins. I just do not see it but he is more informed than I.

        Comment

        • Lobot
          Administrator
          • Apr 2007
          • 28223

          #5
          My hope is that JC French IV turns out to be a capable game manager at a minimum. I think he's more capable than we think. I'm hoping sans Sorsby we can avoid the late season swoon that's plagued us the last two years.
          Brent Wyrick
          92 Final Four Front Row
          @LobotC2DFW

          Comment

          • swilsonsp4
            Veteran
            • Apr 2007
            • 5072

            #6
            Originally posted by leo from jersey
            well we have a new DC. Waiting to see how he will succeed. The offense worries me, but this great line can do wonders for the so called skilled players. If we get off to a bad start will Coach Satt mail it in?
            I don't see Satterfield mailing in anything. He's not Tommy Tuberville.

            Comment

            • Bearcat93
              Distinguished Member
              • Mar 2020
              • 645

              #7
              Originally posted by swilsonsp4

              I don't see Satterfield mailing in anything. He's not Tommy Tuberville.
              Have you seen them at the same place at the same time? 5-7.

              Comment

              • Bearcat1996
                Distinguished Member
                • Oct 2007
                • 687

                #8
                No buzz on this team. The media ignores them. HS football is more popular than UC football by a mile.

                Comment

                • London 'Cat
                  Super Moderator
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 4322

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Lobot
                  My hope is that JC French IV turns out to be a capable game manager at a minimum. I think he's more capable than we think. I'm hoping sans Sorsby we can avoid the late season swoon that's plagued us the last two years.
                  I think French wants to prove he can play at a P4 conference. Whether he can or not remains to be seen. UC does not need an all-conference QB just as Lobot wrote "a capable game manager." If he turns out to be something more, that will be a bonus. The RBs and OL will carry this team. If the WRs can create separation, something we have not seen consistently under CSS, we may have a solid offense. I am still concerned with the defense, which I read is still a 3-4 scheme. We all know how that turned out last season - sieves on the field. Maybe under the new DC it will be different but I have concerns with the scheme as a whole.

                  Comment

                  • leo from jersey
                    Veteran
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 6178

                    #10
                    Originally posted by swilsonsp4

                    I don't see Satterfield mailing in anything. He's not Tommy Tuberville.
                    TT had a golden parachute waiting for him. SS, while paid nicely, future can't be up. The town, both national and local media basically have a nonchalant attitude towards UC. I hope SS changes that, but how will he react if he doesn't. It will be interesting to see the fans reaction if the play is bad on the field. My hope is that he turns it into an eight win season. The truth be told, I want more than an 8 win season. It has been proven that UC can do that. Let's see it in the BIG12. IF he can't there has been some notable names once associated with UC who would like to make a jump up. I don't want to think that before the season starts and I still wonder what last year might have ended without the BS at QB.

                    One final thought. The Basketball team has a positive vibe right now. If it continues and the FB team is not doing well, fans love a winner.
                    Last edited by leo from jersey; Today, 06:35 AM.

                    Comment

                    Responsive Ad Widget

                    Collapse
                    Working...