CFP Expansion

[longtimefan]

Officially will be 24 next year

“Student” athletes playing 4-5 extra games per year?

[swilsonsp4]

“Student” athletes playing 4-5 extra games per year?

FCS teams have been doing this for years. Their playoffs began in 1981 with 8 participants. There have been 24 since 2013.

[bearcatbret]

Some information being posted:
1. the power 4 conferences will not have a championship game.
2. the group conferences have not decided yet.
3. the top team in the power 4 conferences will get in.
4. the highest rated group team will get in.
5. the remaining teams will get in based on the CFP rankings.

[Lobot]

If they don't open the group of whatever number we're now on, to all FBS conferences, they'll eat an antitrust suit I would think.

[bearcatbret]

Something interesting for all of you:

Thank You ESPN, for Killing College Football': Fans Furious Over Major NCAA Football Changes
By Bryan Chai Nov 10th, 2026
College football has always been a sport that understood the value of tradition. Rivalries mattered. Conference championships mattered. And competing for the national championship was supposed to be for a rare and select few.
Apparently, that was getting in the way of the money.
ESPN announced a major new agreement with the College Football Playoff, making the network the exclusive worldwide media rights holder for the expanded 24-team playoff.
The new format will begin next season, with ESPN's agreement running through the 2031 season. And judging by the reaction from college football fans, the people making these decisions might want to spend a little less time congratulating themselves.
One fan on X summed up the frustration rather succinctly: "Thank you ESPN, for killing college football."
That's certainly a blunt assessment. But it's not difficult to understand where the frustration is coming from.
To be clear, change isn't inherently bad. College football has evolved throughout its history, and there's nothing sacred about preserving every aspect of the sport exactly as it exists today.
But there's a difference between making meaningful improvements and seemingly changing everything at once because somebody sees another opportunity to make money.
A 24-team College Football Playoff is an absurd proposition. At some point, the postseason stops being an exclusive competition among the nation's best teams and starts looking like an elaborate excuse to squeeze more games, advertising inventory and television revenue out of the sport.
And that's precisely how this latest announcement comes across.
The reaction was particularly fierce after CFP executive director Rich Clark addressed the criticism surrounding the expanded field.
"We’re aware of the fan sentiment, and that many fans aren’t in favor of expansion," Clark said. "That was certainly weighed into the decision and it was considered. But ultimately, we just need to make a spectacular Playoff."
Well, that ought to go over swimmingly.
Clark's comments have become a lightning rod for criticism online, with fans interpreting them as an extraordinary admission that the people running college football are perfectly comfortable disregarding what their customers actually want.
And honestly, it's difficult to blame them for that interpretation.
When an executive acknowledges that fans oppose a major change but essentially responds that the decision-makers have something spectacular planned anyway, it doesn't exactly inspire confidence.
------------------
ESPN is single-handedly destroying
everything that made college sports unique. Regional conferences, regional rivalries, every game mattering, it’s all gone. And it’s gone because of ESPN’s greed and need to control everything.
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) November 9, 2026
------------------
There's another part of this overhaul that deserves considerably more attention: the loss of the Power Four conference championship games.
Those games were once among the most meaningful events on the college football calendar. Winning a conference championship was an accomplishment in its own right, something programs could celebrate regardless of whether they ultimately competed for a national title.
Now, that tradition is being pushed aside in favor of an increasingly bloated postseason.
That's a shame.
College football's appeal has always been about more than simply determining which team is the best in the country. It's about regional rivalries, conference pride, historic matchups and the significance of individual Saturdays throughout the season.
When you start removing those traditions while simultaneously expanding the national championship tournament to 24 teams, it's fair to wonder what exactly you're trying to preserve.
The new arrangement also gives ESPN exclusive worldwide media rights through 2031, further consolidating the network's relationship with the sport's most lucrative postseason event.
ESPN chairman Jimmy Pitaro naturally celebrated the agreement, calling it a moment that reinforces the network's position as the "preeminent destination for college sports."
That's a wonderful development for ESPN's business interests. Whether it's a wonderful development for college football is another matter entirely.
And that's the problem.
The people making these decisions seem increasingly interested in building a postseason entertainment product rather than protecting the sport that made that product valuable in the first place.
Perhaps the expanded playoff will produce some spectacular games. Perhaps fans will eventually embrace the new format.
But there's a real danger in assuming that because you can make something bigger, you automatically make it better.
College football didn't become one of America's most beloved sports because it had a 24-team playoff. It became beloved because its traditions, rivalries and regular-season stakes made every game feel important.
Those are the things worth protecting.
And if the people running the sport keep treating them as expendable, they shouldn't be surprised when the fans start wondering whether anybody is actually listening.
Full story and comments at the link:
https://w-j.co/s/a36a2

[red_n_black_attack]

A 24 team playoff sounds elaborate and way too many, but FCS has had a 24 team playoff since 1978. It allows a team to grow, and overcome from an early season loss or two, or a key injury to a player that misses 1-2 games, not the season. At the end of the day, the conference championship games were already a money grab, so eliminating them is a step in the right direction. With 24 teams, they need to give the top 8 teams a bye, so most teams will only play a max of 1 extra game versus current 12 team playoff with elimination of CCG. Ultimately this will be good for college football. An expanded playoff hasn't hurt NFL or college/pro basketball, and has increased interest in the regular season as more teams have a shot for the playoff later in the season. It will also be good for the Big 12 as we will have 4-5 teams in the bracket.