Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It could be worse

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • It could be worse

    Regionally, check out looserville's record and Indiana's record. I am sure that there are even worse out there so take a deep breath and be glad that we are not under penalties. See UM vs. Wisconsin.

  • #2
    Originally posted by bearcatbret View Post
    Regionally, check out looserville's record and Indiana's record. I am sure that there are even worse out there so take a deep breath and be glad that we are not under penalties. See UM vs. Wisconsin.
    Howard only got a 5 game and will be back for the BIG Tourney. That is a joke.-- I don't measure by other teams, I go by what I see in a Cincinnati uniform.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by bearcatbret View Post
      Regionally, check out looserville's record and Indiana's record. I am sure that there are even worse out there so take a deep breath and be glad that we are not under penalties. See UM vs. Wisconsin.
      Of the teams you mentioned, only Louisville is really in a worse position than us. But in the spirit of this thread, here are some other notable teams that are having worse seasons than ours:

      -Maryland (12-14, NET #95, midseason coaching change)
      -Florida State (14-13, NET #98, Sweet 16 last year)
      -Minnesota (13-12, NET #101, first year head coach)
      -Arizona St (10-16, NET #119, have not won a tournament game in Hurley's 7 seasons)
      -Utah (11-16, NET #122, first year head coach, 6-year tournament drought)
      -NC State (11-16, NET #131, have not won a tournament game in past 7 seasons)
      -Washington (13-12, NET #132, one tournament appearance in past 11 seasons)

      Comment


      • #4
        IU is 16-10 and standing at 9th in the B1G. In reality, IU has not done much since they ran Bobby Knight out of town.

        Comment


        • #5
          Here's Justin Williams' take on the state of the program. In essence, this is about what was expected, preseason, and that this is a multi-year rebuild:

          https://theathletic.com/3141111/2022...ampaign=601983

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by swilsonsp4 View Post
            Here's Justin Williams' take on the state of the program. In essence, this is about what was expected, preseason, and that this is a multi-year rebuild:

            https://theathletic.com/3141111/2022...ampaign=601983
            What else can you expect CWM to say. What else can Justin write as of now due to the need to be close to the program. I would like to have seen a rise instead of a fall, but I beleive there should be some improvement next year. At least, I hope there is and I am positive that there will be some and perhaps more.

            Comment


            • #7
              Not sure that there is a 'multi-year' rebuild in college basketball anymore. Great players are one and done, some go from high school to g-league or overseas, transfer portal speeds up any potential rebuild process. What fans or AD would tolerate a multi-year rebuild nowadays in college basketball?

              College football used to have a 4-5 year program rebuild as tolerable/acceptable with coaches wanting a good amount fifth year seniors - now it's a 3-year max timeframe for a rebuild given the transfer portal - look how many coaches Tennessee... or Florida has gone through since Urban left - the fan base is impatient. Of course with 85 scholarship players college football needs more time for a rebuild than basketball, but no way is a 3-year rebuild acceptable in college hoops today.

              Comment


              • #8
                I dont want a multi-year rebuild, no one does, but if we don't find a big guy with some post moves, strength and ability to rebound, that's where we're headed.

                Comment

                Responsive Ad Widget

                Collapse
                Working...
                X