American Tournament

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rufus
    Veteran
    • Apr 2019
    • 2696

    #136
    The fat lady has done sung. Turn out the lights when you leave.

    Comment

    • BearKatz
      Veteran
      • Oct 2014
      • 3227

      #137
      Originally posted by bearcat1518

      just stop that ridiculousness. Houston’s roster is mostly 3-star guys, including Sasser who was #399 ranked in his class.

      Nolley - 4 star/#67 composite
      DDJ - 4 star/#107
      Skillings - 4 star/#105
      Hensley - 4 star/#125
      Lahkin - #123
      Ody started 2 years in ACC
      Stoo acting like they don’t have talent.

      btw…go look at that Xavier roster. Similar to Houston…hardly any 4-stars, but through coaching and effort they are a great team!!
      You're ranking has nothing to do with Basketball Skills... UC has had a ton of 3 Star Players over the last 30yrs who had more TALENT than the above 4 star players you mentioned....

      What was Kenyon Martin's ranking coming into UC..? And you're telling all of us Kenyon was not more skilled than the above mentioned... Thats Ridiculous!

      Comment

      • hipal88
        Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 351

        #138
        What is the deal w Hensley??? He is obviously not staying. Why did he come? Why did Wes bring him. That is what is so frustrating.

        Comment

        • longtimefan
          Veteran
          • Mar 2009
          • 5497

          #139
          Originally posted by bearcat1518

          just stop that ridiculousness. Houston’s roster is mostly 3-star guys, including Sasser who was #399 ranked in his class.

          Nolley - 4 star/#67 composite
          DDJ - 4 star/#107
          Skillings - 4 star/#105
          Hensley - 4 star/#125
          Lahkin - #123
          Ody started 2 years in ACC
          Stoo acting like they don’t have talent.

          btw…go look at that Xavier roster. Similar to Houston…hardly any 4-stars, but through coaching and effort they are a great team!!
          Those are recruit rankings. This game was men against boys. As Terry Nelson said, we suffered from a mismatch at all 5 positions. I would have played both Reed and Skillings a lot more this year, and they’d both be better now. Reed has the body to compete in a physical game like this. Instead we played low ceiling guys with more experience. Now it’s time for a hard look at the roster.

          Comment

          • Bearcat9796
            Distinguished Member
            • Dec 2018
            • 541

            #140
            Originally posted by bearcat1518
            We are playing a team who lost their best player and conference POY, and we are still down 20. Just pathetic.

            I don’t know what’s worse…Wes’s continued lack of a game plan, or the pathetic play of those seniors. This has got to be the softest/laziest/dumbest Bearcat team ever.
            a team that's really good without there best player...someone said snakebit and that's correct

            no one game plans to miss open shots and get killed on the boards

            what should the game plan have been?

            Comment

            • longtimefan
              Veteran
              • Mar 2009
              • 5497

              #141
              Originally posted by hipal88
              What is the deal w Hensley??? He is obviously not staying. Why did he come? Why did Wes bring him. That is what is so frustrating.
              Wes took over a roster with no players, he was desperate.

              Comment

              • BearKatz
                Veteran
                • Oct 2014
                • 3227

                #142
                Originally posted by hipal88
                What is the deal w Hensley??? He is obviously not staying. Why did he come? Why did Wes bring him. That is what is so frustrating.

                Maybe Wes decided Hensley couldn't contribute or compete at this level.. I had high hopes for him.

                Comment

                • BearKatz
                  Veteran
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 3227

                  #143
                  Originally posted by longtimefan

                  Those are recruit rankings. This game was men against boys. As Terry Nelson said, we suffered from a mismatch at all 5 positions. I would have played both Reed and Skillings a lot more this year, and they’d both be better now. Reed has the body to compete in a physical game like this. Instead we played low ceiling guys with more experience. Now it’s time for a hard look at the roster.

                  I totally agree... Rankings look great coming out of High School.... But it was a mismatch at every position... The talent is just not there..And I SMH why Reed was not given a shot to play more . Especially looking at today's performance.

                  Comment

                  • London 'Cat
                    Super Moderator
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 4338

                    #144
                    UC was never going to win this game. Houston has lost 2 games all season. They are truly excellent. UC’s best players were outmatched by even Houston’s subs. Houston was better in every facet of the game. There is nothing coaching could have done to overcome that. UC did compete at times but could not sustain it.

                    Comment

                    • SKell82155
                      Member
                      • Mar 2022
                      • 252

                      #145
                      Originally posted by BearKatz


                      I remember a team a few years back that use to play the same way..
                      Agree, as well as with London Cat. They were over matched and played like they knew it. Didn’t appear to me they dug in and competed. Also, 2nd half appeared to be officiated differently than the 1st, from the bit I saw.

                      Comment

                      • SKell82155
                        Member
                        • Mar 2022
                        • 252

                        #146
                        Originally posted by longtimefan

                        Those are recruit rankings. This game was men against boys. As Terry Nelson said, we suffered from a mismatch at all 5 positions. I would have played both Reed and Skillings a lot more this year, and they’d both be better now. Reed has the body to compete in a physical game like this. Instead we played low ceiling guys with more experience. Now it’s time for a hard look at the roster.
                        Don’t disagree but don’t think it will happen.

                        Comment

                        • leo from jersey
                          Veteran
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 6208

                          #147
                          Glad my son in law told me it was a blowout so I didn't watch. You can coach hustle by seating folks on the bench.

                          Comment

                          • Rufus
                            Veteran
                            • Apr 2019
                            • 2696

                            #148
                            If Miller has a good handle on who's leaving and who's staying. Who he's going to ask to remain and who he's not then if and when the invite to the NIT comes then play the ones who are remaining. Let them get some needed playing together and developing time. Let's waste no more time on those who are moving on and reward those that are returning the playing time.

                            Comment

                            • bearcatbret
                              Veteran
                              • May 2008
                              • 8462

                              #149
                              Well, scoring 48 points is not going to win games for you. Also, only making 50-percent of your free throws will not win games not to mention missing the first end of a 1 and 1. We could have kept the 1st half close if we made the free throws. I feel badly for David for not having a good game. He has been very good for UC.

                              Comment

                              • London 'Cat
                                Super Moderator
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 4338

                                #150
                                Originally posted by Rufus
                                If Miller has a good handle on who's leaving and who's staying. Who he's going to ask to remain and who he's not then if and when the invite to the NIT comes then play the ones who are remaining. Let them get some needed playing together and developing time. Let's waste no more time on those who are moving on and reward those that are returning the playing time.
                                I understand the philosophy behind that, but this team isn’t going anywhere in the NIT either. Play whomever for the one or two games they will be in the tournament.

                                Comment

                                Responsive Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...