NCAA Tournament and Bracket

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sedz
    Veteran
    • Jan 2024
    • 1270

    #76
    Duke is just crazy good. They have elite talent across the board. But even they play 4 wings. They don't play anyone under 6'5 and Flagg is a point forward at 6'9 205. 1-4 are basically positionless.

    Comment

    • sedz
      Veteran
      • Jan 2024
      • 1270

      #77
      A couple of great late games after the earlier blowouts.

      Arkansas is long and athletic at every position. Brazile is 6'10 230 but he's quick, handles the ball, slashes to the rim from the perimeter, and shoots the three. He's a big wing similar to Alabama's Grant Nelson. Ivisic is basically a stretch 5. Texas Tech is one of the smallest teams in the tournament. None of the winners tonight play multiple interior big men together.

      Comment

      • BearKatz
        Veteran
        • Oct 2014
        • 3202

        #78
        Texas Tech comes back to win, unbelievable!

        Comment

        • sedz
          Veteran
          • Jan 2024
          • 1270

          #79
          Originally posted by BearKatz
          Texas Tech comes back to win, unbelievable!
          Maybe the best two games of the tournament so far.

          Nate Oats is out here talking about Mike D'Antoni and offensive efficiency. We could use a lot more of that.

          Comment

          • GoBearcats31
            Super Moderator
            • Apr 2007
            • 11734

            #80
            Originally posted by BearKatz
            Texas Tech comes back to win, unbelievable!
            That was cool to see

            Comment

            • BearKatz
              Veteran
              • Oct 2014
              • 3202

              #81
              Mich St holds on to beat Ole Miss... Helluva Game!

              TN is absolutely Crushing KY!

              Comment

              • GoBearcats31
                Super Moderator
                • Apr 2007
                • 11734

                #82
                Still in awe of the play that Houston ran to beat Purdue. Genius.

                Comment

                • sedz
                  Veteran
                  • Jan 2024
                  • 1270

                  #83
                  Originally posted by GoBearcats31
                  Still in awe of the play that Houston ran to beat Purdue. Genius.
                  I'm with Candace Parker. I have no idea what Purdue was thinking there. You can't just abandon the passer on a baseline inbound play. It would have been an open layup no matter what play Houston ran. Good job to recognize it though.

                  Comment

                  • bearcatbret
                    Veteran
                    • May 2008
                    • 8361

                    #84
                    The scary thing with the current matchups is that the SEC could possibly have all four teams in the final 4. Teams left: SEC - 4, B1G 10 - 1, ACC - 1, Big 12 - 2. I do not see anyone beating Duke though, but maybe Bama and that is who they will play.

                    Comment

                    • swilsonsp4
                      Veteran
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 5062

                      #85
                      Originally posted by sedz
                      I'm with Candace Parker. I have no idea what Purdue was thinking there. You can't just abandon the passer on a baseline inbound play. It would have been an open layup no matter what play Houston ran. Good job to recognize it though.
                      Milos Uzan said the play was designed with three options. Purdue took away Cryer, which was option #1. This occurred while Jo Jo Tugler set a weak-side pick at the high post, then rolled open in front of Uzan, which was option #2. He didn't say what would occur, if that didn't work.

                      I just looked at the replay in stop motion. When the play began, Uzan's man was in proper position. However, he saw Cryer break open to the weakside over Tugler's screen, so he left Uzan to cover Cryer, who was going to be wide open. Tugler's defender slid to midpost towards Tugler. That left the low post uncovered, which Uzan exploited. Meanwhile, Roberts and Sharp were along the strong-side sideline, with neither moving until Tugler passed back to Uzan.

                      Last edited by swilsonsp4; 03-29-2025, 10:45 AM.

                      Comment

                      • sedz
                        Veteran
                        • Jan 2024
                        • 1270

                        #86
                        Originally posted by swilsonsp4

                        Milos Uzan said the play was designed with three options. Purdue took away Cryer, which was option #1. This occurred while Jo Jo Tugler set a weak-side pick at the high post, then rolled open in front of Uzan, which was option #2. He didn't say what would occur, if that didn't work.

                        I just looked at the replay in stop motion. When the play began, Uzan's man was in proper position. However, he saw Cryer break open to the weakside over Tugler's screen, so he left Uzan to cover Cryer, who was going to be wide open. Tugler's defender slid to midpost towards Tugler. That left the low post uncovered, which Uzan exploited. Meanwhile, Roberts and Sharp were along the strong-side sideline, with neither moving until Tugler passed back to Uzan.

                        https://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...st-second-play
                        Right, nothing unusual happening on Houston's side. Just a simple Iverson screen. The strange thing is how Purdue decided to defend it. The normal way to cut off a pass to the rim or across the baseline (to Cryer or anyone else) would be for Uzan's man to stand under the basket. Instead, Braden Smith turns and runs all the way to the opposite corner on a switch. That's a huge gamble, and it left CJ Cox with the impossible task of having to cover Uzan from all the way at the top of the key. They didn't switch the screen, they switched from an off ball defender. Very strange.

                        Comment

                        • sedz
                          Veteran
                          • Jan 2024
                          • 1270

                          #87
                          I'm loving the physicality in this Florida v Texas Tech game. There are no free defensive rebounds.

                          Comment

                          • Pharmfam
                            Distinguished Member
                            • Jan 2009
                            • 524

                            #88
                            Originally posted by sedz
                            I'm loving the physicality in this Florida v Texas Tech game. There are no free defensive rebounds.
                            This is a great game. Both teams tough as nails.
                            ...a fountain of eternal youth, a tower of strength, a rock of truth...

                            Comment

                            • BearKatz
                              Veteran
                              • Oct 2014
                              • 3202

                              #89
                              Florida is going to pull it out!

                              Comment

                              • longtimefan
                                Veteran
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 5434

                                #90
                                Originally posted by Pharmfam

                                This is a great game. Both teams tough as nails.
                                TTU gave it away at the line, 2 missed front ends in the final minute, while FL made 4 straight threes. Free throws….

                                Comment

                                Responsive Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...