^We did sell out the tosu game and the OK game with Butch at PBS.
							
						
					Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
Texas, Oklahoma reach out to SEC about joining conference
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
When the Bengals leave in a few years because we won't build the Brown family a new stadium and we are in the ACC, we can start playing our higher profile games there. We will be the only football in town and will sell out. Seriously, being the only game in town is what helps Louisville.Originally posted by bearcatbret View Post^We did sell out the tosu game and the OK game with Butch at PBS.
I'm a dreamer of course.
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
My son, whose degrees were from other (eastern) schools, was with me at the Oklahoma game, and commented that it really felt like "big time football." Just an example of what is achievable even with the Bungles in town - given quality opponents for UC.Originally posted by swilsonsp4 View Post
While the OSU game was a sell-out, the Okies drew 58,253 (capacity 65,515) in 2010.
- 1 like
 
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Here's a story about Mike Aresco yelling at the Alliance for leaving out the AAC. ($)
https://theathletic.com/news/aac-com...e/GZxZ6OZTAJ5eBrent Wyrick
92 Final Four Front Row
@LobotC2DFW
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Yelling, whining, acting out and confusing everyone. This was unnecessary and unwarranted. For the same reasons the AAC is not being picked clean for realignment, though many members deserve it and will do well, making an Alliance with the AAC doesn't add much value to the Alliance. Sure there would be value in a scheduling rotation with some of the top AAC schools, and that would take away from scheduling strength of SEC games, but top to bottom the AAC is not deserving to be included.Originally posted by Lobot View PostHere's a story about Mike Aresco yelling at the Alliance for leaving out the AAC. ($)
https://theathletic.com/news/aac-com...e/GZxZ6OZTAJ5e
We want out for this reason. We have something to offer. As do USF, Houston, Memphis, and UCF. The reality is the top AAC schools are equivalent to the second tier P5 schools, including left behind 8.Red and Black are more of an Attitude than merely a color combination.
Intimidate! Dominate! Celebrate!
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I think Aresco is just trying to talk up his conference and keep them in the conversation. Like when he calls the AAC one of the P6 and when he was touting UCF as the national champion that one year that they went undefeated. I get what he is doing and don't have a problem with it but no one in the Power 4 conferences listens to him or takes him serious. It is nothing against him but they know that the AAC from top to bottom isn't on par.Originally posted by red_n_black_attack View Post
Yelling, whining, acting out and confusing everyone. This was unnecessary and unwarranted. For the same reasons the AAC is not being picked clean for realignment, though many members deserve it and will do well, making an Alliance with the AAC doesn't add much value to the Alliance. Sure there would be value in a scheduling rotation with some of the top AAC schools, and that would take away from scheduling strength of SEC games, but top to bottom the AAC is not deserving to be included.
We want out for this reason. We have something to offer. As do USF, Houston, Memphis, and UCF. The reality is the top AAC schools are equivalent to the second tier P5 schools, including left behind 8.Last edited by Bearcats1232002; 08-27-2021, 10:05 AM.
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
He’s being an advocate for his league, what’s wrong with that?Originally posted by red_n_black_attack View Post
Yelling, whining, acting out and confusing everyone. This was unnecessary and unwarranted. For the same reasons the AAC is not being picked clean for realignment, though many members deserve it and will do well, making an Alliance with the AAC doesn't add much value to the Alliance. Sure there would be value in a scheduling rotation with some of the top AAC schools, and that would take away from scheduling strength of SEC games, but top to bottom the AAC is not deserving to be included.
We want out for this reason. We have something to offer. As do USF, Houston, Memphis, and UCF. The reality is the top AAC schools are equivalent to the second tier P5 schools, including left behind 8.
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Right? Isn't that what he's paid to do? If he just sits back and takes it from the other conferences, then people would be criticizing him for being weak. I at least admire his message - we don't know yet what the Alliance will do so how can he analyze its impact. That is a fair point, even if it is stated rather non-eloquently.Originally posted by longtimefan View Post
He’s being an advocate for his league, what’s wrong with that?
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
He should've approached the Alliance commissioners and let them know he is on board with what he is hearing and ask directly to be included. This should've been done last week when rumors started circulating en masse. Yeah, he was promoting the league, but it was whiny and without actionable merit. I'd rather hear that he reached out, had a conversation and agrees with the educational emphasis on student part of student athletes. Then add in a large chat about the educational programs at AAC institutions, and how they match the values and deliverables of ACC, Big 10, and Pac. He could close with quick mention that AAC was not in the handshake scheduling deal with the Alliance; however; we are and will continue to engage in contractual agreements to play Alliance member institutions.
Instead he complained about not being invited to the party. Sometimes you have to invite yourself self and state your philosophical alignment.Red and Black are more of an Attitude than merely a color combination.
Intimidate! Dominate! Celebrate!
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
we know a statement doesn't really matter... but makes it more likely we are headed to the Big12... travel is gonna SUCK if that happens... It would be kinda neat to get OK St., Iowa St (if they stay relevant), and to a lesser extent Texas Tech at Nippert. Also miss our rivalry with WVU if they don't bolt to the ACC. Beats ECU and Tulane...Last edited by Chewbacca2099; 08-26-2021, 03:39 PM.
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I’m not willing to join the B12 unless a new TV contract is worked out giving equal shares to all the teams, with a significant jump from the current AAC money. Even then I’m skeptical about it, especially if BIG 12 will be looked at as Gang of 6. All of the AAC teams should take the same stance.Originally posted by Chewbacca2099 View Postwe know a statement doesn't really matter... but makes it more likely we are headed to the Big12... travel is gonna SUCK if that happens... It would be kinda neat to get OK St., Iowa St (if they stay relevant), and to a lesser extent Texas Tech at Nippert. Also miss our rivalry with WVU if they don't bolt to the ACC. Beats ECU and Tulane...
Or, maybe the AAC boots ECU and Tulane, and absorbs the BIG 12.
Comment
 
Responsive Ad Widget
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
Comment