My only question is how reliable are the author's sources? My comment to the article:
"I'd be more excited by this article if you could partially identify the "sources". Forgive me for having expansion fatigue, but as a fan of the program most likely to be added in 2016, I am awaiting an invitation or a public statement from the Big 12. If your source for this article is a Big 12 AD or University President that is a good sign, better if a member of the Big 12 expansion committee. I know you cannot name the source so info keeps coming, but please give us some indication of how reliable is this source."
"I'd be more excited by this article if you could partially identify the "sources". Forgive me for having expansion fatigue, but as a fan of the program most likely to be added in 2016, I am awaiting an invitation or a public statement from the Big 12. If your source for this article is a Big 12 AD or University President that is a good sign, better if a member of the Big 12 expansion committee. I know you cannot name the source so info keeps coming, but please give us some indication of how reliable is this source."
Comment