Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oklahoma 9/23 Noon Fox

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • swilsonsp4
    started a topic Oklahoma 9/23 Noon Fox

    Oklahoma 9/23 Noon Fox

    Per a Sooner's site, the game in 10 days will KO @ noon.
    Last edited by swilsonsp4; 09-13-2023, 08:50 PM.

  • Bearcat93
    replied
    The fact that Fox didn't pivot from this game when we lost to Miami is also pretty telling. There's a lot of street cred these days about Nippert - notice how it's being billed as "Historic Nippert Stadium" in media announcements? We also showed up in the group of government funded protection/rehab for college football stadiums, whatever that bill was that's being floated.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    Originally posted by Bearcat93 View Post
    On a Nippert note, it’s truly amazing where our gameday experience has evolved to across the last 20 years; from the transformation of a parking lot into Sigma Sigma commons, to the expanded and improved Nippert stadium to the surrounding tailgating zones on Short Vine …..wow, so grateful to be where we are today. Thank you Rick Minter for laying the modern foundation for all the great things to come. I know many of us remember even just a few years before Minter, you could walk in at halftime without paying, the ushers just waved you in to join the few thousand fans in attendance
    Truth. ESPN and FOX wouldn't have sniffed the place in the late 80s

    Leave a comment:


  • Bearcat93
    replied
    On a Nippert note, it’s truly amazing where our gameday experience has evolved to across the last 20 years; from the transformation of a parking lot into Sigma Sigma commons, to the expanded and improved Nippert stadium to the surrounding tailgating zones on Short Vine …..wow, so grateful to be where we are today. Thank you Rick Minter for laying the modern foundation for all the great things to come. I know many of us remember even just a few years before Minter, you could walk in at halftime without paying, the ushers just waved you in to join the few thousand fans in attendance

    Leave a comment:


  • D.A.H.
    replied
    Originally posted by Bearcat93 View Post

    Didn’t Dee Wiggins play in this offense at Louisville? I know Henderson played for a full year with Emory. My point is that this isn’t a group that’s totally unfamiliar with what’s around them. I also think throwing short slants & screens shouldn’t take 4 games. Satterfield’s post game comments were definitely not what I appreciate. He needs to be a little more accountable and a little more reflective about what’s happening. Let’s at least try running the TE’s across the middle, WR slants to the inside, RB’s that get 20 carries a game…..it can’t hurt.
    i agree that the offense struggled mightily against oklahoma, but oklahoma, thorugh four games, has only given up 34 points - their defense is pretty damn good. there's a huge talent gap between us and them, at this point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bearcat93
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobot View Post

    Some of the stuff with EJ, and the receivers for that matter, may just be an unfamiliarity with the offense they're running. A lot of these guys have been at UC all of 3 months. Some closer to 6. With a couple of exceptions like Wiggins who transferred from Louisville, none of them have experience in this scheme on a gameday except for the last 4 games.

    Satterfield maybe very limited in what he can call on offense due to this. Therefore you get extremely predictable play calling because you can't call something they can't run well yet. It sort of reminds me of Cronin trying to install the offense halfway through the non conference schedule in basketball and wondering why we get beat by Presbyterian early in the season.
    Didn’t Dee Wiggins play in this offense at Louisville? I know Henderson played for a full year with Emory. My point is that this isn’t a group that’s totally unfamiliar with what’s around them. I also think throwing short slants & screens shouldn’t take 4 games. Satterfield’s post game comments were definitely not what I appreciate. He needs to be a little more accountable and a little more reflective about what’s happening. Let’s at least try running the TE’s across the middle, WR slants to the inside, RB’s that get 20 carries a game…..it can’t hurt.
    Last edited by Bearcat93; 09-25-2023, 04:15 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Burk View Post

    I agree but I also think Ben was better at finding open receivers
    Without a doubt

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Burk
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobot View Post

    You're not wrong.

    Jones is more mobile then Ben. He at least gives you a shot at running for a first down even if he doesn't get there. Ben definitely throws a better ball than Emory does but he's a sitting duck against a good pass rush with the O lIne we have. I think the result of having Ben out there against Oklahoma would have been a lot more sacks and nowhere close to the yardage he put up at Northwestern this past weekend.
    I agree but I also think Ben was better at finding open receivers

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    Originally posted by bearcat1518 View Post

    Interesting that this forum didn’t give this same excuse to last year’s QB - who just put up 400 yards and 4 TDs with a fragile roster and against a good Big 10 defense.
    You're not wrong.

    Jones is more mobile then Ben. He at least gives you a shot at running for a first down even if he doesn't get there. Ben definitely throws a better ball than Emory does but he's a sitting duck against a good pass rush with the O lIne we have. I think the result of having Ben out there against Oklahoma would have been a lot more sacks and nowhere close to the yardage he put up at Northwestern this past weekend.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    Originally posted by Bearcat93 View Post
    I hear you, but as a 6th year QB having started
    for two different P5 programs, his processing speed, his ability to read/react, isn’t very good. Now, since the decision has been made to start him, I’d ask if the coaching staff isn’t equally to blame for his ineffectiveness. Maybe more shot gun? Definitely more slants across the middle to keep his eyes open to the whole field. All these routes to the sidelines is leaving open receivers on the opposite side of the field as missed opportunities. Having been to 2 of the 3 games in person, you can watch all the options and see how target 1 focused he is a lot of the time. I think Friday’s a great opportunity to see what his road presence is, amidst a raucous crowd. Another ineffective performance with no vertical passing or at least 1-2 passing TD’s, I’d ask why we aren’t looking to the future.
    Some of the stuff with EJ, and the receivers for that matter, may just be an unfamiliarity with the offense they're running. A lot of these guys have been at UC all of 3 months. Some closer to 6. With a couple of exceptions like Wiggins who transferred from Louisville, none of them have experience in this scheme on a gameday except for the last 4 games.

    Satterfield maybe very limited in what he can call on offense due to this. Therefore you get extremely predictable play calling because you can't call something they can't run well yet. It sort of reminds me of Cronin trying to install the offense halfway through the non conference schedule in basketball and wondering why we get beat by Presbyterian early in the season.

    Leave a comment:


  • bearcat1518
    replied
    Originally posted by D.A.H. View Post

    not saying that EJ has been great / really good, but he doesn't exactly have the luxury of sitting back there. he's been on the run an awful lot so far.
    Interesting that this forum didn’t give this same excuse to last year’s QB - who just put up 400 yards and 4 TDs with a fragile roster and against a good Big 10 defense.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bearcat93
    replied
    I hear you, but as a 6th year QB having started
    for two different P5 programs, his processing speed, his ability to read/react, isn’t very good. Now, since the decision has been made to start him, I’d ask if the coaching staff isn’t equally to blame for his ineffectiveness. Maybe more shot gun? Definitely more slants across the middle to keep his eyes open to the whole field. All these routes to the sidelines is leaving open receivers on the opposite side of the field as missed opportunities. Having been to 2 of the 3 games in person, you can watch all the options and see how target 1 focused he is a lot of the time. I think Friday’s a great opportunity to see what his road presence is, amidst a raucous crowd. Another ineffective performance with no vertical passing or at least 1-2 passing TD’s, I’d ask why we aren’t looking to the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • D.A.H.
    replied
    Originally posted by Bearcat93 View Post

    EMORY JONES WILL HAVE TO BE MORE EFFICIENT

    On the flip side of this equation, Cincinnati quarterback Emory Jones must be more efficient if the Bearcats are going to get out of the rut they find themselves in. Against Oklahoma, Jones went 22-41 and threw for 235 yards and two interceptions. He was the Bearcats’ leading rusher but turned 15 carries into just 42 yards (2.8 yards per carry). There were times when he missed open receivers, overthrew chances for big plays, and potentially left some points on the field. Sure, it was against a much-improved Oklahoma defense, but there were chances that he simply missed. With a road trip to BYU coming next week, he won’t have much time to get things going before the next stiff challenge.

    A very accurate summation.
    not saying that EJ has been great / really good, but he doesn't exactly have the luxury of sitting back there. he's been on the run an awful lot so far.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bearcat93
    replied
    Originally posted by bearcatbret View Post
    EMORY JONES WILL HAVE TO BE MORE EFFICIENT

    On the flip side of this equation, Cincinnati quarterback Emory Jones must be more efficient if the Bearcats are going to get out of the rut they find themselves in. Against Oklahoma, Jones went 22-41 and threw for 235 yards and two interceptions. He was the Bearcats’ leading rusher but turned 15 carries into just 42 yards (2.8 yards per carry). There were times when he missed open receivers, overthrew chances for big plays, and potentially left some points on the field. Sure, it was against a much-improved Oklahoma defense, but there were chances that he simply missed. With a road trip to BYU coming next week, he won’t have much time to get things going before the next stiff challenge.

    A very accurate summation.

    Leave a comment:


  • bearcatbret
    replied
    Three thoughts on the game. Three Thoughts on Oklahoma's 20-6 Win Over Cincinnati (heartlandcollegesports.com)

    Leave a comment:

Responsive Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X