They probably use something more granular like Synergy or ShotTracker. Or at least I hope they are. Those tools use video and algorithms that can give much more detailed analysis. They can assign primary defenders to each shot and analyze screens and things that don't show up in the box score. That's true advanced analytics. Some college coaches like Nate Oats have really embraced it. It's all over the NBA.
Omari Prince would be our guy. He's the video coordinator and his bio lists Synergy and a couple others. https://gobearcats.com/sports/mens-b...ari-prince/466
I don't know how much Wes considers his advice though. It's up to Wes how much he uses analytics. I've been skeptical since the day we hired Wes that he's an analytics guy. We wouldn't have a constant midrange greenlight if he was.
I use BPM because it's the best freely available data tool, and we have a consistent data set going back to 2008 with some nice, easy to use sorting tools developed by Bart Torvik. The NBA has some other similar metrics like PER and VORP that don't work as well with unbalanced schedules, so for college basketball I think BPM is the best metric for stat minded fans.
Omari Prince would be our guy. He's the video coordinator and his bio lists Synergy and a couple others. https://gobearcats.com/sports/mens-b...ari-prince/466
I don't know how much Wes considers his advice though. It's up to Wes how much he uses analytics. I've been skeptical since the day we hired Wes that he's an analytics guy. We wouldn't have a constant midrange greenlight if he was.
I use BPM because it's the best freely available data tool, and we have a consistent data set going back to 2008 with some nice, easy to use sorting tools developed by Bart Torvik. The NBA has some other similar metrics like PER and VORP that don't work as well with unbalanced schedules, so for college basketball I think BPM is the best metric for stat minded fans.
Comment