Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Expansion thread 2022
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
PAC TV deal sometime mid-January to mid-February. Expansion in March or April. This does not paint roses for the PAC. Pac-12 Hotline mailbag: As 2023 looms, conference faces existential crisis (tucson.com)
- 1 like
-
It must be a slow news cycle because they are talking Big 10 expansion again. At the end of this article, there is a link for the 15 schools to watch. ESPN’s Paul Finebaum expects Big Ten to continue expansion – see who he thinks will join the league (yahoo.com)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lobot View Post
Based on that, they just need to take the biggest paycheck from the media compnaies and be done with it. They aren't going to get ratings in that conference reagrdless of where they put their games, so maximize the return.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by richard k. View PostBetween geography and time differential how many people east of the Rockies give a hoot about when, where, or even why, PAC12 games are aired (or, for that matter, even played)?
Leave a comment:
-
Between geography and time differential how many people east of the Rockies give a hoot about when, where, or even why, PAC12 games are aired (or, for that matter, even played)?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by swilsonsp4 View PostHere's a piece by Stuart Mandel of theathletic.com ($) that lays out pros and cons of a possible move by George Kliavkoff to move the majority of their sports programming to Amazon. Mandel does not make any predictions as to how this ends up for the P12, but he does reference a prediction by John Ourand of the Sports Business Journal (Amazon + a few primetime games on CBS).
Mandel: Pros and cons of a Pac-12 media rights deal almost exclusively with Amazon - The Athletic
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bearcatbret View PostNothing new with the PAC but they expect something early in January. Pac-12 media rights: What’s next for the conference after UCLA’s (official) departure – Orange County Register (ocregister.com)
Leave a comment:
-
Here's a piece by Stuart Mandel of theathletic.com ($) that lays out pros and cons of a possible move by George Kliavkoff to move the majority of their sports programming to Amazon. Mandel does not make any predictions as to how this ends up for the P12, but he does reference a prediction by John Ourand of the Sports Business Journal (Amazon + a few primetime games on CBS).
Mandel: Pros and cons of a Pac-12 media rights deal almost exclusively with Amazon - The Athletic
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
PAC 12 players transferring to USC. I guess that the move to the Big 10 by USC may be interesting to some players. Pac-12 receiving leader Dorian Singer transfers to USC (msn.com)
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Why Fresno may get invited to the Pac 12. Because UCLA and USC cannot vote against it. Fresno State makes Pac-12 statement with LA Bowl blowout | The Fresno Bee
Leave a comment:
-
Nothing new with the PAC but they expect something early in January. Pac-12 media rights: What’s next for the conference after UCLA’s (official) departure – Orange County Register (ocregister.com)
Leave a comment:
-
Here is an article about the regents' decision. It appears that UCLA will be required to supplement the University of California at Berkley's athletic fund.
California Regents vote to affirm UCLA’s move to Big Ten | The Sacramento Bee (sacbee.com)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chewbacca2099 View PostUCLA ->BIG10 official. Now we will see if the rest of the PAC starts making moves now
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
UCLA ->BIG10 official. Now we will see if the rest of the PAC starts making moves now
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bearcatbret View Post
When UCLA leaves and when the PAC gets a streaming rights deal that will provide next to zero viewers, then they will bail. I just do not see any of the remaining PAC teams adding value to the Big 10. I think that the Big 10 will look towards the ACC. Remember that if enough members of the ACC vote to dissolve, they can. Some teams to the SEC some to the BIG. I think that the Big 12 is safe for now because there are no brand names with big markets.Originally posted by Lobot View Post
I think if UCLA leaves, the floodgates might open for the schools to get out of the PAC12
Top Pac10 targets
Oregon
Washington
Utah
Meh, none of the rest excite me
Top ACC targets (not likely to go to SEC or B!G)
Loserville
Pitt
Virginia Tech
Wake or NC State (one to SEC, but not both)
Depending on who is left, the other could vary from any of these schools: Cal, Colorado, or Georgia Tech. However, I don't see the ACC taking action to dissolve until around 2031 or 2032, which may be too late for some of the ACC teams to latch onto Big 12.
My scenario:
SEC and B!G both add only two teams to go to 18 or 20 (both probably thinking they can pluck Big 12 teams that prove themselves over the next few years, so no one feels safe outside those two conferences)
SEC gets Fla St, Miami, and Clemson with the 4th being Wake or NC State
Big Ten gets North Carolina, Boston College, and Virginia with 4th being Cuse or Duke. Duke only if North Carolina wants package deal to keep basketball rivalry.
Leave a comment:
Responsive Ad Widget
Collapse
Leave a comment: