Miami 9/14 12:00 ESPNU

[Bearcat93]

Sounds like everything’s fine according to Cunningham

[bearcatjd]

Uc 28
mu 21

[Lobot]

i think tomorrow's coffee with cunningham could get interesting - wonder if anyone brings CSS up as a topic?

Oh man I can't attend these things and tomorrow's is going to be lit. I'll be surprised if they don't cancel it last minute

[D.A.H.]

Look deeper into that. Satterfield was never respected by the fans and boosters there because they wanted Jeff Brohm to begin with and had an interim AD making that hire who then left after 2 more years. Would they have fired him? Maybe. Looked like he was going to get one more year there after a late run but who knows. Was it smart for him to leave before they could push him out? Yes because they were not happy about him contacting South Carolina in 2021. Shane Beamer got that job over him.

Did we pay his buyout to get him? Yes, and it looks really foolish until you realize that Wisconsin paid the exact same amount of buyout for Fickell and it was a net zero from a financial standpoint on the contracts. The part that really bugs me from UC isn't this. It's the university's buyout and guaranteed salary on the contract. I think our booster put us over a barrel and we lost any type of leverage on that contract. I believe we were dealing with super agent Jimmy Sexton on that one. He's the agent responsible for resetting the market when Nick Saban got 10M /yr.

i think tomorrow's coffee with cunningham could get interesting - wonder if anyone brings CSS up as a topic?

[Lobot]

I talked to a friend who is from Louisville, and he asked me "why the he*l" would we hire a guy that they were going to fire at UL. Saved them millions. He then thanked me.....Defies logic.

B.C.

Look deeper into that. Satterfield was never respected by the fans and boosters there because they wanted Jeff Brohm to begin with and had an interim AD making that hire who then left after 2 more years. Would they have fired him? Maybe. Looked like he was going to get one more year there after a late run but who knows. Was it smart for him to leave before they could push him out? Yes because they were not happy about him contacting South Carolina in 2021. Shane Beamer got that job over him.

Did we pay his buyout to get him? Yes, and it looks really foolish until you realize that Wisconsin paid the exact same amount of buyout for Fickell and it was a net zero from a financial standpoint on the contracts. The part that really bugs me from UC isn't this. It's the university's buyout and guaranteed salary on the contract. I think our booster put us over a barrel and we lost any type of leverage on that contract. I believe we were dealing with super agent Jimmy Sexton on that one. He's the agent responsible for resetting the market when Nick Saban got 10M /yr.

[Bearcat Chris]

Win or lose, at least I’m gong to eat Bagel Stop! I see no competitive future for UC football under Satterville.

I talked to a friend who is from Louisville, and he asked me "why the he*l" would we hire a guy that they were going to fire at UL. Saved them millions. He then thanked me.....Defies logic.

B.C.

[Bearcat93]

Win or lose, at least I’m gong to eat Bagel Stop! I see no competitive future for UC football under Satterville.

[longtimefan]

I hate to say this, but Miami wins 31-17.

[bearcatbret]

As I said last year after the loss to the Redskins, this game must be in the coach's contract as a must win or cause for dismissal.

[longtimefan]

I just don’t see a win here.