1) I think he's doing an OK job. I'd give him a C+ grade at best at this point. I don't think that he has the personality to light things on fire in the recruiting world. He's shown no propensity to recruit local Ohio kids and that's an issue to me. There's nothing wrong with the recruits he's getting but UC is at it's best when we hit the recruiting trial in state. We improved this year record wise and in recruiting compared to the previous year but I'm just not confident that the progress is sustainable with Satterfield.
2) I think CSS is a good bridge coach. We've done much better with up and coming coaches generally over the years. Having a coach with a decent amount of D1 HC experience was probably a good move going into the Big XII but I'm not sure he was the right guy to hire. The coaching pool was pretty thin at the time. I suspect we will move on after his contract expires unless the bottom falls out first. Don't be surprised if we extend his contract for recruiting reasons with a smaller buyout attached before we move on though.
What is it the kids say nowadays, "He's mid." ?
2) I think CSS is a good bridge coach. We've done much better with up and coming coaches generally over the years. Having a coach with a decent amount of D1 HC experience was probably a good move going into the Big XII but I'm not sure he was the right guy to hire. The coaching pool was pretty thin at the time. I suspect we will move on after his contract expires unless the bottom falls out first. Don't be surprised if we extend his contract for recruiting reasons with a smaller buyout attached before we move on though.
What is it the kids say nowadays, "He's mid." ?
Comment