Transfer Portal 2026

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • London 'Cat
    replied
    Originally posted by D.A.H.

    that just shows the fallacy of "stats". If you truly believe that this past year's UC team was the 30th ranked team in the country, because some website stat guy told you it was, I have a bridge for sale.
    I disagree. From February 5 until the end of the season, the team played good basketball, for the most part. That was a stretch where it won 4 in a row, went 6-2 to end the regular season, and 1-1 in the BIGXII tournament. It wasn't enough to get them into the tournament but the team showed improvement over its play early in conference. I think 30th sounds about right statistically. As you pointed out, stats aren't everything.

    Leave a comment:


  • D.A.H.
    replied
    Originally posted by longtimefan
    Last year’s team finished #30 in Torvik. I’ll gladly take that or better this coming season. The key will be winning tough close games, the kind we just couldn’t finish the last few years. We won’t have Jizzle to blame anymore.
    that just shows the fallacy of "stats". If you truly believe that this past year's UC team was the 30th ranked team in the country, because some website stat guy told you it was, I have a bridge for sale.

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    This maybe it for this year. We have to see the conditions and be glad for improvements in team play and individual. Next year hopefully more money and incoming frosh. I hopefully can stay positive until CJC gets a foundation.

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    Originally posted by Oldtimer_UC_fan

    I seriously hope he has someone helping him with his free throw shooting. That could be a problem late in close games.
    shot dr where are you when an emergency calls.

    Leave a comment:


  • bearcatbret
    replied
    Here is some sarcasm for you: With today's NCAA rules, could UC recruit an NBA player? lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • leeraymond372@gmail.com
    replied
    I did not realize Hastings was a pure 5. I thought he was a combo 4/5. He is kind of short for a pure 5. My guess is Calhoun may experiment with Hastings at the 4 and Allenspach at the 5 in practice to see if both guys can play together.

    Let's not forget that the roster is not complete yet. Calhoun still has more guys to bring in. I think that UC still needs another big as was mentioned previously. Right now, UC only has three sizeable bigs. That is not enough. UC needs at least one more true big man. Either a 4 or a combo 4/5. Somebody 6'10" or taller that can move on the perimeter, defend, rebound, and hit a shot. Is that asking for too much?

    Who else can UC bring in to fill that spot?

    Leave a comment:


  • leeraymond372@gmail.com
    replied
    UC picks up Hastings. Finally, something good on the big man front to talk about. Let's check out his stats from last season (ACC): 6.7 pts/g, 61% FG, 5.6 RB/g, 50% FT, 1.5 Blocks/g, and 3.2 PF/g. Hastings is 6'9" 240. Played his high school ball at IMG Academy.

    Hastings has played at the highest levels since high school, so he knows what big time basketball is about. He has a low turnover rate, about 1/g and a good solid BPM. Needs to increase his FT % but overall, a good pick up for UC.
    Last edited by leeraymond372@gmail.com; 04-28-2026, 08:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GoBearcats31
    replied
    Originally posted by Natination113
    Hastings just committed!
    Signed already too

    Leave a comment:


  • Oldtimer_UC_fan
    replied
    Originally posted by sedz
    It's a mostly complete roster now. We still don't have a true 4, but that's not a big deal in the modern game. We can succeed with 3 wings if they hit the glass, which Mahaffey, Colvin, and Carson have proven they can do and Tejada/Elamin can be persuaded to.

    Hastings is a top defensive big. 3.5 DBPM even beat Thiam's 3.4 by a hair. Evan Miya is a little higher on his offense giving him a positive OBPR. He was the only player on BC with a positive +/- for the season. He profiles as a pure 5, so we'll have to see if Calhoun wants to play two bigs together or rotate Hastings and Allenspach at the 5. Might depend on what Iweze can contribute.

    My previous assessment:

    I seriously hope he has someone helping him with his free throw shooting. That could be a problem late in close games.

    Leave a comment:


  • sedz
    replied
    It's a mostly complete roster now. We still don't have a true 4, but that's not a big deal in the modern game. We can succeed with 3 wings if they hit the glass, which Mahaffey, Colvin, and Carson have proven they can do and Tejada/Elamin can be persuaded to.

    Hastings is a top defensive big. 3.5 DBPM even beat Thiam's 3.4 by a hair. Evan Miya is a little higher on his offense giving him a positive OBPR. He was the only player on BC with a positive +/- for the season. He profiles as a pure 5, so we'll have to see if Calhoun wants to play two bigs together or rotate Hastings and Allenspach at the 5. Might depend on what Iweze can contribute.

    My previous assessment:
    Originally posted by sedz
    Some noise around Jayden Hastings, 6'9" defensive specialist C from Boston College. Posted a 2.3 BPM in his sophomore season (negative 1.2 OBPM with a 3.5 DBPM). Low usage on offense and a poor FT shooter (under 50% for his career) but an elite shot blocker (8% block rate, top 10 in the portal among players with 20+ mpg) and a good rebounder (11% OReb). Fouls almost 6 times per 40 minutes. Would be a nice complement to Allenspach when we need some rim protection.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rufus
    replied
    That is good news. We have our rim protector!

    Leave a comment:


  • sedz
    replied
    Got Hastings!

    Leave a comment:


  • Natination113
    replied
    Hastings just committed!

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    Originally posted by Natination113

    Agreed. He was a streaky player. Would have a few good games and follow up with a few bad games in a row. No real consistency throughout his career. I liked him as a player but definitely thought he was exposed this year. Too many bad plays/turnovers during crunch time. I wish him the best but easily replaceable.
    I gave him a pass his frosh year. Speaking of pass during his second year I saw wretched passing especially at crunch time. I saw him dribble up the clock and the last second throw a pass that got his teammate off hs stride for a miss and a loss. Of course the shot lovers blamed the shooter and not the one who was supposed to be able to pass, but could not. Many just think shooting makes a gamer, but it is the complete game and JJ did not have a quality one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natination113
    replied
    Originally posted by Oldtimer_UC_fan

    No doubt JJ has talent, but he probably got more credit than he should have because of his father.
    Agreed. He was a streaky player. Would have a few good games and follow up with a few bad games in a row. No real consistency throughout his career. I liked him as a player but definitely thought he was exposed this year. Too many bad plays/turnovers during crunch time. I wish him the best but easily replaceable.

    Leave a comment:

Responsive Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...