Originally posted by Gmann
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Basketball Transfer Portal '25
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by leo from jersey; Yesterday, 09:45 AM.
-
Originally posted by Longtime Lurker View Post
But, to take it from the players' perspective-if boosters are going to pay good money for you to play (for the same or more than you would make overseas without having to move out of the country), why wouldn't you? They have a finite amount of time before their bodies can't keep up and they stop being good enough to get paid-and if they graduated and went pro, none of us would tell them it was time to move on. Like it or not, until the NCAA grows a pair (not likely), college sports is just another pro league right now-I'm not going to fault the players for taking advantage of a system the schools are too stupid to fix. I'd love to think that at least some of them are getting some education during this time, and they have the rest of their life (with a nest egg to pay for it) to finish their education, get a "real job", etc.
At what point should the NCAA say, hey you have no eligibility left. Move on to a pro career if you still want to play basketball. It is time to move on. Let some of the younger players, that are still in school, make some money too.Last edited by leeraymond; Yesterday, 12:34 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John P View Post
Last year most of the players opted to stay in Cincy so I would assume that would account for a lot less posts about incoming portal players.
The problem now is that Wes has to now get back to being in the top half of the Big 12 before we can have an expectation of competing with the top of this league. Arizona, Baylor, Kansas are always going to have NIL money. K-State, Iowa St., BYU.....Cincinnati has to upgrade to their level. If next season is just Day-Day and Jizzle dribbling and shooting, it ain't happening.
Comment
-
In response to some comments here, I still believe that athletes have five years to compete in four years. There should not be exceptions for athletes to compete in five, six or even seven years. I could see a graduate student playing if he graduated in four years and has one year of eligibility left. Not more than that though. I am getting tired of all of this - the money, the lawyers, the agents and even the players. It is hard to get behind the players if you know that they are going to jump.
Comment
-
Originally posted by leeraymond View Post
Yeah. I can see it from the players' perspective too. However, these players are asking the NCAA, with the help of lawyers, to grant more eligibility just to play basketball. How should the NCAA treat students that have their degrees already? Should these students be allowed to go back to school and play If granted extra eligibility? Some of these players are going be 26 and 27 years old, and maybe older, and still playing college ball.
At what point should the NCAA say, hey you have no eligibility left. Move on to a pro career if you still want to play basketball. It is time to move on. Let some of the younger players, that are still in school, make some money too.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by bearcatbret View PostIn response to some comments here, I still believe that athletes have five years to compete in four years. There should not be exceptions for athletes to compete in five, six or even seven years. I could see a graduate student playing if he graduated in four years and has one year of eligibility left. Not more than that though. I am getting tired of all of this - the money, the lawyers, the agents and even the players. It is hard to get behind the players if you know that they are going to jump.
- 1 like
Comment
Responsive Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment