2026-27 Team News

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rufus
    Veteran
    • Apr 2019
    • 2696

    #61
    No as in He has no eligibility or no that the NCAA has no right to arbitrarily ban these players. And what is the new evidence ?

    Comment

    • London 'Cat
      Super Moderator
      • Mar 2007
      • 4341

      #62
      Originally posted by Rufus
      No as in He has no eligibility or no that the NCAA has no right to arbitrarily ban these players. And what is the new evidence ?
      Long answer.
      • The NCAA lost in the trial court - athletes eligible.
      • The NCAA appealed that decision and also moved for a stay during appeal, which the court granted - athletes not eligible.
      • The athletes sought a reconsideration of the stay, which the court denied - athletes ineligible.
      Now, the appeal rests in the court of appeals. No oral argument set, to my knowledge. It will likely take the court until after the season ends to issue its decision.

      Summary - athletes remain ineligible until the appeals court issues a decision in their favor and against the NCAA. In my experience, this will be months from now.

      Don't know anything about new evidence.

      Comment

      • London 'Cat
        Super Moderator
        • Mar 2007
        • 4341

        #63
        Originally posted by London 'Cat

        Long answer.
        • The NCAA lost in the trial court - athletes eligible.
        • The NCAA appealed that decision and also moved for a stay during appeal, which the court granted - athletes not eligible.
        • The athletes sought a reconsideration of the stay, which the court denied - athletes ineligible.
        Now, the appeal rests in the court of appeals. No oral argument set, to my knowledge. It will likely take the court until after the season ends to issue its decision.

        Summary - athletes remain ineligible until the appeals court issues a decision in their favor and against the NCAA. In my experience, this will be months from now.

        Don't know anything about new evidence.
        Updated with Gov. DeWine's executive order issued this week:
        • EO 2026-04D authorizes Ohio universities to disregard NCAA eligibility rules for class of 2022 athletes
        • The Ohio Supreme Court stayed the appellate court decision reversing the trial court's decision - athletes eligible again
        • OSC asked the parties to brief the effect of the EO by October 19 at 5 pm
        The OSC will rule on the impact of the EO on the NCAA rule on eligibility for 2022 athletes. This means MJ Collins is now eligible until the OSC rules otherwise.

        Comment

        • Lobot
          Administrator
          • Apr 2007
          • 28377

          #64
          Schroedinger's Bearcat. Simultaneously eligible and ineligible
          Brent Wyrick
          92 Final Four Front Row
          @LobotC2DFW

          Comment

          • leeraymond372@gmail.com
            Member
            • Jul 2025
            • 255

            #65
            Has anyone kept an eye on Baba Miller? He had a pretty good rookie preseason with the LA Clippers. He averaged about 20 minutes a game (over a 3-game preseason) and also averaged 11 points, 5 rebounds, 1.3 assists, 1 steal, and less than 1 block. I saw him play against Denver last night (10/14/26). He did not handle the ball as much as I thought he would. He went for 15 and 5 and had 2 assists and 1 block in about 20 minutes off the bench.

            He looks like he will be a productive pro. I wonder if the Clippers will keep him and put him in the rotation or if they will let him develop a little more in the G-league. He looked good last night. No bad shots.

            Comment

            Responsive Ad Widget

            Collapse
            Working...