Coach Scott Satterfield

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JohnFrancis
    Distinguished Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 829

    #76
    Solid hire and I wish him well...but I think USF and Liberty made "bigger splashes"

    Will be very interesting to see where where USF and Liberty are in a few years versus Bearcat program...I know it is not apples to apples comparison but it will be interesting nonetheless

    To quote Kramer from Seinfeld: "You don't sell the steak, you sell the sizzle"

    Comment

    • longtimefan
      Veteran
      • Mar 2009
      • 5439

      #77
      Originally posted by JohnFrancis
      Solid hire and I wish him well...but I think USF and Liberty made "bigger splashes"

      Will be very interesting to see where where USF and Liberty are in a few years versus Bearcat program...I know it is not apples to apples comparison but it will be interesting nonetheless

      To quote Kramer from Seinfeld: "You don't sell the steak, you sell the sizzle"
      There was a lot of sizzle with Tuberville.

      Comment

      • Flying Jalapeno
        Member
        • Apr 2019
        • 44

        #78
        I didn't like his answer about not really looking at or knowing the roster. How can you take a job without knowing the roster?

        Comment

        • GoBearcats31
          Super Moderator
          • Apr 2007
          • 11744

          #79
          The Bearcats’ hiring of its upcoming opponent’s coach came as the two teams planned to face each other Fenway Bowl. Plus, it’s raising questions at Purdue, too.

          Pat Forde: The Ripple Effects of Cincinnati’s New Hire Extend Past Its Bowl Matchup

          Comment

          • JohnFrancis
            Distinguished Member
            • Jul 2008
            • 829

            #80
            Does anyone think this hire is akin to Mizzou hiring Eliah Drinkwitz a few years ago???

            Comment

            • leo from jersey
              Veteran
              • Apr 2007
              • 6178

              #81
              Originally posted by JohnFrancis
              Does anyone think this hire is akin to Mizzou hiring Eliah Drinkwitz a few years ago???
              Why both from Appy state and both wear glasses

              Comment

              • RedDog
                Veteran
                • Jul 2007
                • 1223

                #82
                Originally posted by longtimefan

                There was a lot of sizzle with Tuberville.
                That was my *** burning!

                Comment

                • RedDog
                  Veteran
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 1223

                  #83
                  Anxious to see the staff assembled and player retention. Comittments and portal activity gonna be a cluster.
                  Time will tell on this hire, but one thing we know for sure is we spent $3.5M more than other options for the priviledge of finding out.

                  Comment

                  • Carin's Dad
                    Veteran
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 3226

                    #84
                    Originally posted by Bearcat Chris
                    For once, I don't have an opinion on whether hiring Satterfield is good or bad. My gut is that the next few years may be really rough. Let's see if he can bring in a few impact players. Seems like a lateral move for him, and usually lateral moves don't end up good.

                    So who is left to coach the Bowl game?

                    B.C.
                    We're good at rough. It's a UC tradition.

                    Comment

                    • London 'Cat
                      Super Moderator
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 4322

                      #85
                      Originally posted by RedDog
                      Anxious to see the staff assembled and player retention. Comittments and portal activity gonna be a cluster.
                      Time will tell on this hire, but one thing we know for sure is we spent $3.5M more than other options for the priviledge of finding out.
                      Wisconsin paid Fickell’s buyout for the same amount. It’s a wash there.

                      Comment

                      • RedDog
                        Veteran
                        • Jul 2007
                        • 1223

                        #86
                        Originally posted by London 'Cat

                        Wisconsin paid Fickell’s buyout for the same amount. It’s a wash there.
                        We had 3.5M in our pocket and an internal hire would have cost us nothing

                        Comment

                        • RedDog
                          Veteran
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 1223

                          #87
                          Originally posted by RedDog

                          We had 3.5M in our pocket and an internal hire would have cost us nothing
                          Not saying thats how we should have gone, just saying we paid a lot and better be sure hes our guy because we had a know entity for free

                          Comment

                          • London 'Cat
                            Super Moderator
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 4322

                            #88
                            Originally posted by RedDog

                            We had 3.5M in our pocket and an internal hire would have cost us nothing
                            An internal hire who wasn’t ready for the job.

                            Comment

                            • RedDog
                              Veteran
                              • Jul 2007
                              • 1223

                              #89
                              Originally posted by London 'Cat

                              An internal hire who wasn’t ready for the job.
                              "Hello", is there anybody there??

                              Comment

                              • JohnFrancis
                                Distinguished Member
                                • Jul 2008
                                • 829

                                #90
                                Originally posted by leo from jersey

                                Why both from Appy state and both wear glasses
                                Well there's that...but living in SEC country, I have observed all the teams for a while. Missouri has a good game every now and then and they look like an offensive juggernaut, then they get blown out 3 games in a row, then they have a good road win or play a higher ranked opponent tough, then get blown out in consecutive games, end up right around five hundred, teasing fans that they have turned the corner and will compete for an east division title (like they did when they first joined the SEC) but it never materializes.

                                I could easily see UC program treading water, trying to stay at .500 or just above and longing for the good 'ol days of BK and CLF. Look at how many years Tennessee (with all their resources) 'wandered in the desert' with a revolving door of coaches until Heupel and Golesh came along.

                                Comment

                                Responsive Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...