If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
My understanding is that this is being handled as an extension, with all changes occurring at the end of the current agreement.
It’s tiered from what I learned today. We don’t get a full share until the new contract kicks in. And to your point, that’s now my understanding as well.
Ourand at SBJ is indicating the total package is 400M for the conference for Tier 1 and 2 rights. This does not appear include postseason or championship cuts from those events.
The question is how this gets divided and when it takes effect. If it’s after Texas and OU depart then we’re talking 33M per school.
My understanding is that this is being handled as an extension, with all changes occurring at the end of the current agreement.
I was really looking forward to $40M or above. I guess that there are lower tiers that may get some revenue. Also, the conference can wait for a year and reopen the negotiations.
I think you're going to get that with the shares of postseason $ in this conference. In all sports. the $33M is strictly TV rights
I was really looking forward to $40M or above. I guess that there are lower tiers that may get some revenue. Also, the conference can wait for a year and reopen the negotiations.
Ourand at SBJ is indicating the total package is 400M for the conference for Tier 1 and 2 rights. This does not appear include postseason or championship cuts from those events.
The question is how this gets divided and when it takes effect. If it’s after Texas and OU depart then we’re talking 33M per school.
The more articles I read, the higher the per school payout is. I've seen anywhere from 33M to 60M per school over the course of 5 articles. The higher the number gets, the more suspect it is IMO. I think we might get lucky to hit 40M but anything is an improvement over 7M
The $33M being tossed around would be strictly from Disney/Fox. There are other sources of income that potentially push each school's receipts much higher.
The more articles I read, the higher the per school payout is. I've seen anywhere from 33M to 60M per school over the course of 5 articles. The higher the number gets, the more suspect it is IMO. I think we might get lucky to hit 40M but anything is an improvement over 7M
The value may just go up because of the competition. These games will mean everything week in and week out. I suspect that Texas and Oklahoma will go the same route as Nebraska. Great money but irrelevant in terms of winning. Heck, those two teams cannot even compete in the Big 12 right now.
Giving the Big 12 all of Utah, Ohio, and Florida is a bit generous. They admittedly are the only shows in those five states, except in Texas where they compete with a very healthy A&M.
I get that and agree with it. It is the same as giving Iowa State the entire state. I just thought it interesting to see marketing in action. However, UC had done a tremendous job in growing its fan base (winning has a way of doing that).
As it transitions from a conference defined by five states with a combined population of a little more than 40 million to one that includes eight states and a combined population of 76.5 million, the Big 12 Conference has contracted with a nationally known creative agency to “contemporize” its brand and broaden its appeal to a younger, more diverse audience.
Giving the Big 12 all of Utah, Ohio, and Florida is a bit generous. They admittedly are the only shows in those five states, except in Texas where they compete with a very healthy A&M.
As it transitions from a conference defined by five states with a combined population of a little more than 40 million to one that includes eight states and a combined population of 76.5 million, the Big 12 Conference has contracted with a nationally known creative agency to “contemporize” its brand and broaden its appeal to a younger, more diverse audience.
Leave a comment: