Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NIL Things - All Sports

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lobot
    replied
    So this is fun. Looks like Matt Brown and Andy Wittry got ahold of the public IRS 990 data for several schools. These list the amount of revenue and expenses generated by the NIL collectives. They listed about 50 of the FBS schools. Unfortunately the data either hasn't been published or they did not ask for UC's data for Cincy Reigns.

    A couple of things here is that the Big XII Schools listed in the report vastly vary on the revenue of their collectives to a point where you can tell who's all in on NIL and who's disorganized.

    Quick breakdown of BIg XII schools that reported.

    Kansas -1.9M revenue
    OK St -2.3M
    Tech -2.8M
    K-State -110K
    TCU -154K
    Iowa St. -658K

    In comparing these to some of the powerhouse Athletic Depts, I ran into the fact that some schools such as Texas and tOSU have NIL multiple collectives with significant assets. Others like ND have all eggs in one collective like UC does.

    Texas ~5.8M in aggregate *appears one of their collectives is strictly for Baseball.
    tOSU~3.8M aggregate
    ND 7.7M
    Last edited by Lobot; 01-30-2024, 11:36 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • swilsonsp4
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobot View Post
    This is paywalled most likely but if you can read it, this a very interesting article which hashes out the numbers and tells us that NIL collective donations are NOT damaging Athletic Dept fundraising for almost all of the D1 schools. It doesn't mention UC specifically but they did talk to the UCF AD and he's saying that their dept fundraising for scholarships and facilities is at or near an all time high even with the NIL collective taking in money. ($?)

    If you can't read the first link try the second one.

    https://www.extrapointsmb.com/p/no-n...ls-heres-proof

    https://www.sportico.com/leagues/col...ey-1234763721/
    The sportico.com article does mention UC specifically as a school whose non-NIL donations are down (19.1%). The largest loss was for Miami-OH (32.2%). UC assistant AD, John Daniel was quoted as saying it's too early to tell if NIL donations are to blame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    Careful with interpreting the stats on the second link. It’s only a one year comparison and we had just come out of the CFP and capital project for the IPF.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    This is paywalled most likely but if you can read it, this a very interesting article which hashes out the numbers and tells us that NIL collective donations are NOT damaging Athletic Dept fundraising for almost all of the D1 schools. It doesn't mention UC specifically but they did talk to the UCF AD and he's saying that their dept fundraising for scholarships and facilities is at or near an all time high even with the NIL collective taking in money. ($?)

    If you can't read the first link try the second one.

    https://www.extrapointsmb.com/p/no-n...ls-heres-proof

    https://www.sportico.com/leagues/col...ey-1234763721/

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    One of the things that's popped up here in people reading the full text of the NCAA's proposal is that Agent registration is voluntary and many of the big agency firms and consultants aren't going to do it because the NCAA has not provided transparency on what information is being collected and how that information is being shared and with whom.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    Originally posted by GoCats1994 View Post
    Someone needs to help me understand the meaning of the word "significant".

    Sure, FSU lost a couple schollys and a handful of recruit contact hours. But the most "significant" penalty that FSU has to take a one year break from brokering relationships between the prospects and its NIL collective. The prospects are still more than able to meet with and benefit from that collective on their own
    Reading the article, I'm not sure where the NIL collective even really came into play here. This a good old fashioned pay for play from a booster. I guess the booster donated to or spoke on behalf of the collective therefore....It's the collective's fault?

    Leave a comment:


  • GoCats1994
    replied
    Someone needs to help me understand the meaning of the word "significant".

    Sure, FSU lost a couple schollys and a handful of recruit contact hours. But the most "significant" penalty that FSU has to take a one year break from brokering relationships between the prospects and its NIL collective. The prospects are still more than able to meet with and benefit from that collective on their own

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    Originally posted by GoBearcats31 View Post
    The NCAA on Thursday announced significant penalties for the Florida State football team -- including two years' probation and disassociating with its NIL collective for one season -- for violating rules on using name, image and likeness offers as a recruiting inducement.

    In addition, an FSU assistant coach, which sources confirmed to ESPN as offensive coordinator Alex Atkins, was suspended three games for his involvement. The university also must disassociate with a specific booster for three years.

    Those penalties mark the first time the NCAA has severed the relationship between a school and its NIL collective as part of an infractions case. It also is the first time the NCAA has punished a school, coach or collective for using NIL as an inducement.

    https://www.espn.com/college-footbal...ule-violations
    Hmm with the rumors of Novelle to Bama

    Leave a comment:


  • GoBearcats31
    replied
    The NCAA on Thursday announced significant penalties for the Florida State football team -- including two years' probation and disassociating with its NIL collective for one season -- for violating rules on using name, image and likeness offers as a recruiting inducement.

    In addition, an FSU assistant coach, which sources confirmed to ESPN as offensive coordinator Alex Atkins, was suspended three games for his involvement. The university also must disassociate with a specific booster for three years.

    Those penalties mark the first time the NCAA has severed the relationship between a school and its NIL collective as part of an infractions case. It also is the first time the NCAA has punished a school, coach or collective for using NIL as an inducement.

    https://www.espn.com/college-footbal...ule-violations

    Leave a comment:


  • red_n_black_attack
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobot View Post
    New proposed NIL rules from the NCAA. Theoretically designed to keep athletes from getting screwed by Contracts and Agents.

    https://www.ncaa.org/news/2024/1/10/...ncy-rules.aspx
    Wow!! The recent Athletic article from Under Armor game indicated recruits talk to three people: position coach, head coach, and the money man. This proposal would negate recruits from high school or portal transfers from knowing their "value" or "money bag offer".


    Prospects


    Finally, the proposal prohibits an NIL entity from engaging in any contact, correspondence or other communication with or providing any benefits to a prospect, potential transfer or any individual associated with them, until the prospect signs a letter of intent, participates in summer activities or practices with the team, or enrolls at the school and attends classes.
    Last edited by red_n_black_attack; 01-11-2024, 07:10 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    by mistake
    Last edited by leo from jersey; 01-11-2024, 02:15 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    New proposed NIL rules from the NCAA. Theoretically designed to keep athletes from getting screwed by Contracts and Agents.

    https://www.ncaa.org/news/2024/1/10/...ncy-rules.aspx

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    Originally posted by Barklee View Post
    Here's the On3 NIL rankings

    https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/player/nil-100/

    Here's UC's numbers. We're way behind the power curve to compete with the big boys.

    https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/pla...team-key=23814'
    You’re correct about us playing catchup but I think it’s important to point out that these On3 valuations are potential NIL earnings not actual payouts. There’s absolutely no way they are accurate regardless of what formula they used to predict these valuations.

    You’re telling me Donovan Ollie was supposed to be the top NIL guy at UC? He couldn’t even get on the field and transferred out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Barklee
    replied
    Here's the On3 NIL rankings

    https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/player/nil-100/

    Here's UC's numbers. We're way behind the power curve to compete with the big boys.

    https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/pla...team-key=23814'

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    And a USA Today version:

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...t/71764258007/

    Leave a comment:

Responsive Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X