NIL Things - All Sports

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lobot
    Administrator
    • Apr 2007
    • 28178

    #226
    Originally posted by JohnFrancis
    Ok, thanks for the clarification - can't UC intervene and grant a dispensation or something. I don't know what's it's like Ohio, but middle and high school athletics are strapped for cash - can't even find enough folks to officiate games. These are not 'for profit' entities so you would think CLC would back off if UC asked them to...this is just really bad PR.
    I'm pretty sure at least the Athletic Dept is aware of the mess by now since it made the rounds a week or so ago. Worst case scenario is CLC doesn't budge and we get a DAAP graphic design student to make them a new logo?
    Brent Wyrick
    92 Final Four Front Row
    @LobotC2DFW

    Comment

    • bearcatbret
      Veteran
      • May 2008
      • 8373

      #227
      A zavier support who owns his own marketing business, has proposed for him to do all the rebranding for free if that school changes it's name to musketeers.

      Comment

      • Lobot
        Administrator
        • Apr 2007
        • 28178

        #228
        Originally posted by bearcatbret
        A zavier support who owns his own marketing business, has proposed for him to do all the rebranding for free if that school changes it's name to musketeers.
        The school has actually done that as of yesterday and posted to social media and made a big deal about it even though they were in the wrong from the get go. They are keeping the red and black color scheme and now it's weird.

        Good thing they taught UC a lesson though. I'm pretty sure if the school district administration had any clue about why you can't just rip off someone's else's trademark, this wouldn't have happened in the first place.
        Brent Wyrick
        92 Final Four Front Row
        @LobotC2DFW

        Comment

        • red_n_black_attack
          Veteran
          • Apr 2007
          • 4130

          #229
          If we can get 40,000 alums/fans to commit to donating $20/month to Cincy Reigns that would total 9.6 million per year for players, on top of what we get from big donors and the NIL arrangements with companies/sponsors. There is no reason that UC cannot be a bigger player in NIL. We have a vary large alumni base, plus the resources of a decent size city that many blue blood schools don't have.

          Please donate today, every bit adds up to allow coaches to be more successful in recruiting.
          Red and Black are more of an Attitude than merely a color combination.

          Intimidate! Dominate! Celebrate!

          Comment

          • Lobot
            Administrator
            • Apr 2007
            • 28178

            #230
            The Ohio legislature has passed a measure included in the “Christmas tree bill” that allows Ohio universities to pay athletes directly. The bill also makes NIL agreements immune to public records requests. That last part probably won’t fly but Dewine will probably sign it anyway.

            I’d expect the Cincy Reigns collective to get absorbed by the University Athletic Dept. as soon as this gets signed.

            As Ohio teams prepare to compete in the College Football Playoff and bowl games, Ohio lawmakers approved legislation to help them compete on the recruiting trail.
            Last edited by Lobot; 12-19-2024, 03:50 PM.
            Brent Wyrick
            92 Final Four Front Row
            @LobotC2DFW

            Comment

            • London 'Cat
              Super Moderator
              • Mar 2007
              • 4319

              #231
              Originally posted by Lobot
              The Ohio legislature has passed a measure included in the “Christmas tree bill” that allows Ohio universities to pay athletes directly. The bill also makes NIL agreements immune to public records requests. That last part probably won’t fly but Dewine will probably sign it anyway.

              I’d expect the Cincy Reigns collective to get absorbed by the University Athletic Dept. as soon as this gets signed.

              https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/...s/76959088007/
              That provision definitely will not fly. But, it will take some legal action to nullify it, and Columbus media is too afraid of aO$U to challenge that portion. It will have to come from outside Columbus media, and by the time that gets resolved, it'll be two years in.

              Comment

              • red_n_black_attack
                Veteran
                • Apr 2007
                • 4130

                #232
                That's an odd comment by Miami U. (Oxford) coach Chuck Martin. He stated that he soent 90% of the past two weeks evaluating portal talent instead of readying his team for their bowl game.
                Sorry, just more evidence football needs to have one portal window in the Spring. NIL is great for the players but timing of the portal window has to change.
                Red and Black are more of an Attitude than merely a color combination.

                Intimidate! Dominate! Celebrate!

                Comment

                • bearcatbret
                  Veteran
                  • May 2008
                  • 8373

                  #233
                  It appears that an executive order has been issued that merges Title 9 and NIL. It requires female athletes to be paid the same amount as male athletes. This is something to keep an eye on.

                  Comment

                  • swilsonsp4
                    Veteran
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 5062

                    #234
                    Originally posted by bearcatbret
                    It appears that an executive order has been issued that merges Title 9 and NIL. It requires female athletes to be paid the same amount as male athletes. This is something to keep an eye on.
                    It wasn't an executive order, but guidance from the US Department of Education. That may not survive the incoming administration next week.

                    Comment

                    • leo from jersey
                      Veteran
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 6174

                      #235
                      Originally posted by swilsonsp4

                      It wasn't an executive order, but guidance from the US Department of Education. That may not survive the incoming administration next week.
                      well Trump was left with a can't win situation. Support it and the schools will be hurting $$$ or deny it and anger women. Politics politics

                      Comment

                      • Lobot
                        Administrator
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 28178

                        #236
                        Originally posted by swilsonsp4

                        It wasn't an executive order, but guidance from the US Department of Education. That may not survive the incoming administration next week.
                        https://apnews.com/article/college-s...9fd5e9e5b0c4c2

                        Brent Wyrick
                        92 Final Four Front Row
                        @LobotC2DFW

                        Comment

                        • London 'Cat
                          Super Moderator
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 4319

                          #237
                          Well that changes things . . . . .

                          Comment

                          • swilsonsp4
                            Veteran
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 5062

                            #238
                            Originally posted by London 'Cat

                            Well that changes things . . . . .
                            That will depend upon the new leadership at the Department of Education. If they concur, then the NCAA and member institutions likely will need to reset. There's nothing to stop the DOE from reversing the guidance.
                            Last edited by swilsonsp4; 01-19-2025, 08:33 PM.

                            Comment

                            • longtimefan
                              Veteran
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 5436

                              #239
                              NIL was originally just what the name implies. Guys could get paid if their likeness was in a EA Sports game, if they did a commercial, if they signed at an autograph show, on and on. Once it was decided teams could explicitly pay athletes, I actually expected this. It will further separate the haves from the have nots.

                              Comment

                              • bearcatbret
                                Veteran
                                • May 2008
                                • 8373

                                #240
                                Back pay to athletes dating back to 2016 - House vs. NCAA Settlement Explained - University of Cincinnati Athletics

                                Comment

                                Responsive Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...