Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NCAA Legal Thread

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • red_n_black_attack
    replied
    Originally posted by bearcatbret View Post
    We may start to see a shift of power to schools that do not have a football team. That power shift will go to their basketball teams.
    What do you mean here? If you go by donations, yeah a non-football schools could buy top recruits. However, the football schools will have enough revenue to pour money into both football and basketball, and non-football schools won't have that giant revenue stream.

    Leave a comment:


  • bearcatbret
    replied
    We may start to see a shift of power to schools that do not have a football team. That power shift will go to their basketball teams.

    Leave a comment:


  • swilsonsp4
    replied
    Originally posted by daveh View Post

    "impact fund" = we're going to pound more on donors and ticket holders for more $$$$
    Unfortunately, that is the state of affairs at the vast majority of D1 programs, at least those that want to compete and stay relevant. The best/wealthiest of the P2 aren't worried much about it, but everyone else is. The alternative is to settle for 2nd/3rd class status.

    Leave a comment:


  • daveh
    replied
    Originally posted by GoBearcats31 View Post
    "impact fund" = we're going to pound more on donors and ticket holders for more $$$$

    Leave a comment:


  • leo from jersey
    replied
    Just words -- action remains to be seen

    Leave a comment:


  • GoBearcats31
    replied
    Statement from John Cunningham:

    https://x.com/gobearcats/status/1931...A2NHZ_hNyS2mFg

    Leave a comment:


  • swilsonsp4
    replied
    Originally posted by bearcatbret View Post
    "For the period from July 2025 to June 2026, that cap is projected to be at $20.5 million. This figure isn’t arbitrary; it’s calculated based on a percentage—specifically, 22%—of the average revenue generated by powerhouse schools through ticket sales, TV deals, and sponsorships."

    https://fanrecap.com/ncaa-approves-h...jwxAl9xreXY0WQ

    What does this mean for schools that operate in the red? For all of the Olympic sports that do not make a profit?
    Each school has to decide (if they haven't already) whether they want to (or can) afford to shell out any significant portion of the $20.5M. The settlement allows for schools to choose whether to join in fully. The Ivy League schools have opted out, as have at least two of the Summit League teams (ND & ND State).

    Many schools will choose to pay out a lesser amount overall, including not paying some athletes at all; only the ones in sports that generate a profit. Any athlete who believes he/she is being shorted, relative to their own perceived value, have the option to hit the portal, a risky venture indeed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Greg7173
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobot View Post

    No. This is a theoretically independent NIL regulatory body
    And the key words are "Theoretically Independent". Anyone want to buy a bridge?????? Or perhaps swampland in Florida??

    Leave a comment:


  • bearcatbret
    replied
    "For the period from July 2025 to June 2026, that cap is projected to be at $20.5 million. This figure isn’t arbitrary; it’s calculated based on a percentage—specifically, 22%—of the average revenue generated by powerhouse schools through ticket sales, TV deals, and sponsorships."

    https://fanrecap.com/ncaa-approves-h...jwxAl9xreXY0WQ

    What does this mean for schools that operate in the red? For all of the Olympic sports that do not make a profit?

    Leave a comment:


  • longtimefan
    replied
    I fear the game I loved is gone. A few programs will be the Yankees and Dodgers, 95% the Pirates. It’s actually a worse model than MLB.

    Leave a comment:


  • London 'Cat
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobot View Post

    Which is conveniently the beginning of the fiscal year for UC (or at least it used to be)
    It still is. The state's fiscal years run from July 1 to June 30. Since UC is a state university, I have to believe UC has the same calendar.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    Originally posted by bearcatbret View Post
    Is the College Sports Commission controlled by the B1G 10 and SEC conferences?
    No. This is a theoretically independent NIL regulatory body

    Leave a comment:


  • bearcatbret
    replied
    Is the College Sports Commission controlled by the B1G 10 and SEC conferences?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    The College Sports Commission looks like they're running the NIL show now.

    https://www.collegesportscommission.org/

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobot
    replied
    Originally posted by swilsonsp4 View Post

    They may be ready to merge, but the settlement doesn't go into effect until 7/1/25, so I wouldn't expect it to be up and running until then. (Not that rules have never been broken before around the NCAA landscape.)
    Which is conveniently the beginning of the fiscal year for UC (or at least it used to be)

    Leave a comment:

Responsive Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X