NIL Things - All Sports

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bearcatbret
    Veteran
    • May 2008
    • 8373

    #61
    Well, as fans, we do not make pretty good money and we will not shut up. In fact, we are the ones who are partially funding their pretty good money through tuition, tickets, shirts, etc.

    Comment

    • DesertFog
      Member
      • Dec 2017
      • 177

      #62
      Although I wish NIL would go away, I think Brey's comment is sensible and realistic.

      Comment

      • Lobot
        Administrator
        • Apr 2007
        • 28178

        #63
        Originally posted by DesertFog
        Although I wish NIL would go away, I think Brey's comment is sensible and realistic.
        I agree with that. Coaches need to figure it out as much as they can. It’s confusing right now though.
        Brent Wyrick
        92 Final Four Front Row
        @LobotC2DFW

        Comment

        • leo from jersey
          Veteran
          • Apr 2007
          • 6174

          #64
          It is safe to say, that it is here.

          Comment

          • leo from jersey
            Veteran
            • Apr 2007
            • 6174

            #65
            Kirk Herbstreit predicted this " "I think that there’s another step to this," Herbstreit said. "With the TV networks — I never really said this publicly — but with the TV networks giving a lot of money to college athletics, I think it’s inevitable that eventually the players are going to have it, whether it’s a union or somebody’s going to represent them, and they’re going to say, 'Hey, why not allow us to have a share of the television money?'"

            Comment

            • bearcatbret
              Veteran
              • May 2008
              • 8373

              #66
              I thought that the PAC already formed unions. Or did they just talk about it?

              Comment

              • Lobot
                Administrator
                • Apr 2007
                • 28178

                #67
                Originally posted by bearcatbret
                I thought that the PAC already formed unions. Or did they just talk about it?
                The players tried before NIL and it didn't go their way. Might still be on the table after all this.
                Brent Wyrick
                92 Final Four Front Row
                @LobotC2DFW

                Comment

                • leo from jersey
                  Veteran
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 6174

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Lobot

                  The players tried before NIL and it didn't go their way. Might still be on the table after all this.
                  Well Herbie is well connected with the networks and the teams. I would say that it is a logical progression. The networks don't want to upset either side. Since the NIL we are basically in a brand new day. It will be interesting to see if the power schools try to keep the money out of the hands of all the players and force them to attend their schools for the big pay days.

                  Comment

                  • GoBearcats31
                    Super Moderator
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 11744

                    #69
                    Ohio administrators reject NIL for high school students in Ohio.

                    "Out of 792 member schools of the 817 voting, the measure failed 538-254. So, 68% of OHSAA member schools said no. There were 21 abstentions.

                    By rejecting the proposal, Ohio’s athletes remain unable sign endorsement deals without losing their amateur status."


                    Comment

                    • leo from jersey
                      Veteran
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 6174

                      #70
                      Originally posted by GoBearcats31
                      Ohio administrators reject NIL for high school students in Ohio.

                      "Out of 792 member schools of the 817 voting, the measure failed 538-254. So, 68% of OHSAA member schools said no. There were 21 abstentions.

                      By rejecting the proposal, Ohio’s athletes remain unable sign endorsement deals without losing their amateur status."


                      https://www.cincinnati.com/story/spo...csp=chromepush
                      one battle and not the war.

                      Comment

                      • bearcatbret
                        Veteran
                        • May 2008
                        • 8373

                        #71
                        I wonder if the 32-percent who voted for it are the wealthy districts and private schools.

                        Comment

                        • longtimefan
                          Veteran
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 5436

                          #72
                          Originally posted by GoBearcats31
                          Ohio administrators reject NIL for high school students in Ohio.

                          "Out of 792 member schools of the 817 voting, the measure failed 538-254. So, 68% of OHSAA member schools said no. There were 21 abstentions.

                          By rejecting the proposal, Ohio’s athletes remain unable sign endorsement deals without losing their amateur status."


                          https://www.cincinnati.com/story/spo...csp=chromepush
                          Wasn’t the whole point of NIL to allow players to share in the lucrative TV, conference, and booster money? High School sports are not money makers, except for a few exceptions. In fact many if not most schools charge players a fee to join the teams. I get there are some motivated parents and even more motivated agents hanging around, but NIL for HS just makes no sense.

                          Comment

                          • leo from jersey
                            Veteran
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 6174

                            #73
                            Originally posted by GoBearcats31
                            Ohio administrators reject NIL for high school students in Ohio.

                            "Out of 792 member schools of the 817 voting, the measure failed 538-254. So, 68% of OHSAA member schools said no. There were 21 abstentions.

                            By rejecting the proposal, Ohio’s athletes remain unable sign endorsement deals without losing their amateur status."


                            https://www.cincinnati.com/story/spo...csp=chromepush
                            so does any think that some kids might move out of state to play in a state which has HS NIL deals.

                            Comment

                            • swilsonsp4
                              Veteran
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 5062

                              #74
                              Originally posted by leo from jersey

                              so does any think that some kids might move out of state to play in a state which has HS NIL deals.
                              That's possible, but many of the states (maybe most) have transfer restrictions, usually involving missing a number of games.

                              Comment

                              • GoBearcats31
                                Super Moderator
                                • Apr 2007
                                • 11744

                                #75
                                Originally posted by leo from jersey

                                so does any think that some kids might move out of state to play in a state which has HS NIL deals.
                                Yes, I bet we see some of this

                                Comment

                                Responsive Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...